324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17588645)
1. Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment of radioactive waste disposal.
Agüero A; Pinedo P; Cancio D; Simón I; Moraleda M; Pérez-Sánchez D; Trueba C
Sci Total Environ; 2007 Oct; 384(1-3):36-47. PubMed ID: 17588645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Application of the Spanish methodological approach for biosphere assessment to a generic high-level waste disposal site.
Agüero A; Pinedo P; Simón I; Cancio D; Moraleda M; Trueba C; Pérez-Sánchez D
Sci Total Environ; 2008 Sep; 403(1-3):34-58. PubMed ID: 18614203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Reference Biospheres" for solid radioactive waste disposal: the BIOMASS methodology.
Crossland IG; Pinedo P; Kessler JH; Torres-Vidal C; Walters B
J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):135-49. PubMed ID: 15963607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Consideration of environmental change in performance assessments.
Pinedo P; Thorne M; Egan M; Calvez M; Kautsky U
J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):185-209. PubMed ID: 16198459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Radiological risk assessment and biosphere modelling for radioactive waste disposal in Switzerland.
Brennwald MS; van Dorp F
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Dec; 100(12):1058-61. PubMed ID: 19560845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Recent developments in assessment of long-term radionuclide behavior in the geosphere-biosphere subsystem.
Smith GM; Smith KL; Kowe R; Pérez-Sánchez D; Thorne M; Thiry Y; Read D; Molinero J
J Environ Radioact; 2014 May; 131():89-109. PubMed ID: 24238917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of precipitation, sorption and stable of isotope on maximum release rates of radionuclides from engineered barrier system (EBS) in deep repository.
Malekifarsani A; Skachek MA
J Environ Radioact; 2009 Oct; 100(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 19027996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparative radiological assessment of five European biosphere systems in the context of potential contamination of well water from the hypothetical disposal of radioactive waste.
Olyslaegers G; Zeevaert T; Pinedo P; Simon I; Pröhl G; Kowe R; Chen Q; Mobbs S; Bergström U; Hallberg B; Katona T; Eged K; Kanyar B
J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):375-91. PubMed ID: 16340067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Natural releases from contaminated groundwater, Example Reference Biosphere 2B.
Simón I; Naito M; Thorne MC; Walke R
J Environ Radioact; 2005; 84(2):171-84. PubMed ID: 15985320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Radiation protection recommendations as applied to the disposal of long-lived solid radioactive waste. A report of The International Commission on Radiological Protection.
Ann ICRP; 1998; 28(4):i-vii, 1-25. PubMed ID: 10860107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and comparison of five site-specific biosphere models for safety assessment of radioactive waste disposal.
Pröhl G; Olyslaegers G; Kanyar B; Pinedo P; Bergström U; Mobbs S; Eged K; Katona T; Simón I; Hallberg UB; Chen Q; Kowe R; Zeevaert T
J Radiol Prot; 2005 Dec; 25(4):343-73. PubMed ID: 16352869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. 'Geo'chemical research: a key building block for nuclear waste disposal safety cases.
Altmann S
J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Dec; 102(3-4):174-9. PubMed ID: 19008019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Historical development and evolution of EPRI's post-closure dose assessment of potential releases to the biosphere from the proposed HLW repository at Yucca Mountain.
Smith G; Kozak MW
Health Phys; 2011 Dec; 101(6):709-21. PubMed ID: 22048489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Extension of sensitivity and uncertainty analysis for long term dose assessment of high level nuclear waste disposal sites to uncertainties in the human behaviour.
Albrecht A; Miquel S
J Environ Radioact; 2010 Jan; 101(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 19758732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance assessment model development and parameter acquisition for analysis of the transport of natural radionuclides in a Mediterranean watershed.
Agüero A
Sci Total Environ; 2005 Sep; 348(1-3):32-50. PubMed ID: 16162312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Post-closure biosphere assessment modelling: comparison of complex and more stylised approaches.
Walke RC; Kirchner G; Xu S; Dverstorp B
J Environ Radioact; 2015 Oct; 148():50-8. PubMed ID: 26111499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of the mineral industry NORM/TENORM disposal in hazardous landfills.
Pontedeiro EM; Heilbron PF; Cotta RM
J Hazard Mater; 2007 Jan; 139(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 16621246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Approaches to the definition of potentially exposed groups and potentially exposed populations of biota in the context of solid radioactive waste.
Griffault L; Aubonnet E; Brown J; Guerfi R; Kautsky U; Kowe R; Saetre P; Shibutani S; Smith G; Smith K; Thorne M; Walke R
J Radiol Prot; 2022 May; 42(2):. PubMed ID: 35593511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biosphere modeling methodology for dose assessments of the potential Yucca Mountain deep geological high level radioactive waste repository.
Watkins BM; Smith GM; Little RH; Kessler J
Health Phys; 1999 Apr; 76(4):355-67. PubMed ID: 10086596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Integrated waste management--looking beyond the solid waste horizon.
Seadon JK
Waste Manag; 2006; 26(12):1327-36. PubMed ID: 16765038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
