190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17589356)
1. Hip resurfacing femoral neck fracture influenced by valgus placement.
Anglin C; Masri BA; Tonetti J; Hodgson AJ; Greidanus NV
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 465():71-9. PubMed ID: 17589356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is a valgus position of the femoral component in hip resurfacing protective against spontaneous fracture of the femoral neck?: a biomechanical study.
Schnurr C; Nessler J; Meyer C; Schild HH; Koebke J; König DP
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Apr; 91(4):545-51. PubMed ID: 19336820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of periprosthetic femoral neck fracture after hip resurfacing arthroplasty: valgus compared with anatomic alignment. A biomechanical and clinical analysis.
Richards CJ; Giannitsios D; Huk OL; Zukor DJ; Steffen T; Antoniou J
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():96-101. PubMed ID: 18676943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Femoral neck fracture following hip resurfacing: the effect of alignment of the femoral component.
Davis ET; Olsen M; Zdero R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Nov; 90(11):1522-7. PubMed ID: 18978277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of positioning and notching of resurfaced femurs on femoral neck strength: a biomechanical test.
Nabavi A; Yeoh KM; Shidiac L; Appleyard R; Gillies RM; Turnbull A
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2009 Apr; 17(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 19398793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry analysis of peri-prosthetic stress shielding in the Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement.
Harty JA; Devitt B; Harty LC; Molloy M; McGuinness A
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2005 Dec; 125(10):693-5. PubMed ID: 16237532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Position of hip resurfacing component affects strain and resistance to fracture in the femoral neck.
Vail TP; Glisson RR; Dominguez DE; Kitaoka K; Ottaviano D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Sep; 90(9):1951-60. PubMed ID: 18762656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental evaluation of new concepts in hip arthroplasty.
Wik TS
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2012 Apr; 83(345):1-26. PubMed ID: 22489909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hip resurfacing increases bone strains associated with short-term femoral neck fracture.
Long JP; Santner TJ; Bartel DL
J Orthop Res; 2009 Oct; 27(10):1319-25. PubMed ID: 19338031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of the resurfaced hip. Part 1: the influence of the prosthesis size and positioning on the remodelling and fracture of the femoral neck.
Dickinson AS; Taylor AC; Browne M
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010; 224(3):427-39. PubMed ID: 20408488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Increased strain in the femoral neck following insertion of a resurfacing femoral prosthesis.
Wik TS; Østbyhaug PO; Klaksvik J; Aamodt A
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 20190322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bone mineral density in the femoral neck increases after hip resurfacing: a cohort with five-year follow-up.
Willis-Owen CA; Atkinson HD; Oakeshott RD
Int Orthop; 2011 Sep; 35(9):1303-7. PubMed ID: 20730585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk factor analysis for early femoral failure in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing arthroplasty: the effect of bone density and body mass index.
Gross TP; Liu F
J Orthop Surg Res; 2012 Jan; 7():1. PubMed ID: 22233783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Finite element analysis of femoral neck stress in relation to pelvic width.
Schwarzkopf R; Dong NN; Fetto JF
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2011; 69(4):292-7. PubMed ID: 22196384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A biomechanical comparison of epiphyseal versus metaphyseal fixed bone-conserving hip arthroplasty.
Olsen M; Sellan M; Zdero R; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 May; 93 Suppl 2():122-7. PubMed ID: 21543701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral component positioning in resurfacing arthroplasty--effects on cortical strains.
Kummer FJ; Pereira G; Schachter AK; Jaffe WL
Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2009; 67(4):341-6. PubMed ID: 20001936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Examination of femoral-neck structure using finite element model and bone mineral density using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Qian JG; Song YW; Tang X; Zhang S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Jan; 24(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 18980785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What happens to femoral neck bone mineral density after hip resurfacing surgery?
Cordingley R; Kohan L; Ben-Nissan B
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Dec; 92(12):1648-53. PubMed ID: 21119169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low bone density and high morbidity in patients between 55 and 70 years with displaced femoral neck fractures: a case-control study of 50 patients vs 150 normal controls.
Bartels S; Gjertsen JE; Frihagen F; Rogmark C; Utvåg SE
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Aug; 20(1):371. PubMed ID: 31409337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Femoral neck bone mineral density after resurfacing hip arthroplasty.
Tapaninen T; Kröger H; Jurvelin J; Venesmaa P
Scand J Surg; 2012; 101(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 22968246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
