These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17589562)

  • 1. Would somebody please have a normal vaginal delivery?
    Curry M
    N Z Med J; 2007 Jun; 120(1256):U2595. PubMed ID: 17589562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of first childbirth on changes in women's preference for mode of delivery: follow-up of a longitudinal observational study.
    Pang MW; Leung TN; Lau TK; Hang Chung TK
    Birth; 2008 Jun; 35(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 18507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A clinical trial of active management of labor.
    Manassiev N
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Mar; 334(12):798; author reply 798-9. PubMed ID: 8592560
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A clinical trial of active management of labor.
    Peaceman AM; Socol ML; López-Zeno JA
    N Engl J Med; 1996 Mar; 334(12):797-8; author reply 798-9. PubMed ID: 8592559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A method of delivery after previous cesarean section].
    Karwan-Płońska A; Bińkowska M
    Pol Tyg Lek; 1987 Sep; 42(37):1151-2. PubMed ID: 3432150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Water birth study demonstrates shorter active phases and fewer interventions, but is flawed.
    Bond S
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2010; 55(3):288-9. PubMed ID: 20434094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Taking normal birth forward.
    Downe S
    Pract Midwife; 2009 Jun; 12(6):16-8. PubMed ID: 19624058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Advantages and risks of vaginal delivery after prior cesarean section].
    Hanzelka J; Sucharda I
    Cesk Gynekol; 1985 Mar; 50(2):116-24. PubMed ID: 4005963
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Neonatal mortality for primary cesarean and vaginal births to low-risk women: application of an "intention-to-treat" model.
    MacDorman MF; Declercq E; Menacker F; Malloy MH
    Birth; 2008 Mar; 35(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 18307481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Fetal macrosomia and labor induction: for lack of evidence, we randomize].
    Boulvain M; Epiney M; Morales MA
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1190-3. PubMed ID: 17092754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An overview of upright positions during second stage labor.
    Layer J
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2011; (98):36-9, 67. PubMed ID: 21882742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Fetal macrosomia and labor induction: we are definitely against it].
    Sentilhes L; Verspyck E
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2006 Dec; 34(12):1186-9. PubMed ID: 17092758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The prevention of urinary tract injuries in obstetrics].
    Costăchescu G; Costăchescu G; Anton E
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2005; 109(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 16607784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Difficult vaginal deliveries and how to avoid them.
    Crosby WM
    J Okla State Med Assoc; 1982 Jun; 75(6):144-6. PubMed ID: 7143128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing complications in intended vaginal and caesarean deliveries.
    Kor-Anantakul O; Suwanrath C; Lim A; Chongsuviwatwong V
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2008 Jan; 28(1):64-8. PubMed ID: 18259902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified?
    Harer WB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):693. PubMed ID: 16946234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Management of pregnancy and labor in diabetes mellitus].
    Feldsher Akush; 1983 Oct; 48(10):57-61. PubMed ID: 6557928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Childbirth in women previously subjected to cesarean section].
    Caresano G; Colizzi E
    Minerva Ginecol; 1968 Dec; 20(24):1952-65. PubMed ID: 5753863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can a 29% cesarean delivery rate possibly be justified?
    Resnik R
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 107(4):752-4. PubMed ID: 16582108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Acceleration of the delivery process].
    Leeb H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1970 Mar; 92(11):321-7. PubMed ID: 5515929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.