137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17590160)
1. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study.
Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative measurement of volume changes induced by oral plastic surgery: validation of an optical method using different geometrically-formed specimens.
Studer SP; Sourlier D; Wegmann U; Schärer P; Rees TD
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):950-62. PubMed ID: 9358361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Description of a technique for evaluation of three-dimensional shape alterations in soft tissue after intra oral bone reconstruction.
Wälivaara DA; Isaksson S; Rosén S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 45(5):382-6. PubMed ID: 17141381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.
Persson A; Andersson M; Oden A; Sandborgh-Englund G
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 16543016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system.
Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements: is the largest number of image planes necessary for outlining the region-of-interest?
Pang BS; Kot BC; Ying M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1193-202. PubMed ID: 16875954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a 3D digital photographic imaging system of the human face.
Kimoto K; Garrett NR
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 17302948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computer assisted image analysis methods for evaluation of periodontal wound healing.
Palioto DB; Sato S; Ritman G; Mota LF; Caffesse RG
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 11696912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A new optical 3D-scanning system for CAD/CAM technology.
Mehl A; Hickel R
Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 11351491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of distance and volume measurements.
Riccabona M; Nelson TR; Pretorius DH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 7(6):429-34. PubMed ID: 8807760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding.
Singh GD; Levy-Bercowski D; Yáñez MA; Santiago PE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Aug; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 17651132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three dimensional shape measurement system for residual ridges.
Morimitsu T; Nokubi T; Ono T; Watanabe K; Kibi M; Okuno Y
J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1992 Dec; 32():97-103. PubMed ID: 1341715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A new system for scanning, measuring and analyzing dental casts based on a 3D holographic sensor.
Redlich M; Weinstock T; Abed Y; Schneor R; Holdstein Y; Fischer A
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 May; 11(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 18416750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of accordance of magnetic resonance volumetric and flow measurements in determining ventricular stroke volume in cardiac patients.
Jeltsch M; Ranft S; Klass O; Aschoff AJ; Hoffmann MH
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):530-9. PubMed ID: 18568540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The accuracy of matching three-dimensional photographs with skin surfaces derived from cone-beam computed tomography.
Maal TJ; Plooij JM; Rangel FA; Mollemans W; Schutyser FA; Bergé SJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 37(7):641-6. PubMed ID: 18539435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Method-based differences in the automated analysis of the three-dimensional morphology of trabecular bone.
Simmons CA; Hipp JA
J Bone Miner Res; 1997 Jun; 12(6):942-7. PubMed ID: 9169354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of optical and electromagnetic computer-assisted navigation systems for fluoroscopic targeting.
Ricci WM; Russell TA; Kahler DM; Terrill-Grisoni L; Culley P
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Mar; 22(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 18317053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Matching point clouds: limits and possibilities.
Rudolph H; Quaas S; Luthardt RG
Int J Comput Dent; 2002; 5(2-3):155-64. PubMed ID: 12680049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
