213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17590160)
1. A new optical method to evaluate three-dimensional volume changes of alveolar contours: a methodological in vitro study.
Windisch SI; Jung RE; Sailer I; Studer SP; Ender A; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):545-51. PubMed ID: 17590160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative measurement of volume changes induced by oral plastic surgery: validation of an optical method using different geometrically-formed specimens.
Studer SP; Sourlier D; Wegmann U; Schärer P; Rees TD
J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):950-62. PubMed ID: 9358361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dimensional changes of the ridge contour after socket preservation and buccal overbuilding: an animal study.
Fickl S; Schneider D; Zuhr O; Hinze M; Ender A; Jung RE; Hürzeler MB
J Clin Periodontol; 2009 May; 36(5):442-8. PubMed ID: 19419446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Description of a technique for evaluation of three-dimensional shape alterations in soft tissue after intra oral bone reconstruction.
Wälivaara DA; Isaksson S; Rosén S
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 45(5):382-6. PubMed ID: 17141381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A three-dimensional evaluation of a laser scanner and a touch-probe scanner.
Persson A; Andersson M; Oden A; Sandborgh-Englund G
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):194-200. PubMed ID: 16543016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation and reproducibility of a high-resolution three-dimensional facial imaging system.
Khambay B; Nairn N; Bell A; Miller J; Bowman A; Ayoub AF
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17561318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of the accuracy and reliability of two 3-dimensional sonography methods in volume measurement of small structures: an in vitro phantom study.
Kot BC; Sin DM; Ying M
J Clin Ultrasound; 2009 Feb; 37(2):82-8. PubMed ID: 18803314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use.
Maal TJ; van Loon B; Plooij JM; Rangel F; Ettema AM; Borstlap WA; Bergé SJ
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Oct; 68(10):2391-401. PubMed ID: 20708318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional ultrasound volumetric measurements: is the largest number of image planes necessary for outlining the region-of-interest?
Pang BS; Kot BC; Ying M
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Aug; 32(8):1193-202. PubMed ID: 16875954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of a 3D digital photographic imaging system of the human face.
Kimoto K; Garrett NR
J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Mar; 34(3):201-5. PubMed ID: 17302948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer assisted image analysis methods for evaluation of periodontal wound healing.
Palioto DB; Sato S; Ritman G; Mota LF; Caffesse RG
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 11696912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy and repeatability of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) measurements used in the determination of facial indices in the laboratory setup.
Moerenhout BA; Gelaude F; Swennen GR; Casselman JW; Van Der Sloten J; Mommaerts MY
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 18815053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new optical 3D-scanning system for CAD/CAM technology.
Mehl A; Hickel R
Int J Comput Dent; 1999 Apr; 2(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 11351491
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison between breast volume measurement using 3D surface imaging and classical techniques.
Kovacs L; Eder M; Hollweck R; Zimmermann A; Settles M; Schneider A; Endlich M; Mueller A; Schwenzer-Zimmerer K; Papadopulos NA; Biemer E
Breast; 2007 Apr; 16(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 17029808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional ultrasound: accuracy of distance and volume measurements.
Riccabona M; Nelson TR; Pretorius DH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Jun; 7(6):429-34. PubMed ID: 8807760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional facial morphology following surgical repair of unilateral cleft lip and palate in patients after nasoalveolar molding.
Singh GD; Levy-Bercowski D; Yáñez MA; Santiago PE
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Aug; 10(3):161-6. PubMed ID: 17651132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three dimensional shape measurement system for residual ridges.
Morimitsu T; Nokubi T; Ono T; Watanabe K; Kibi M; Okuno Y
J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1992 Dec; 32():97-103. PubMed ID: 1341715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of three methods of facial measurement.
Ghoddousi H; Edler R; Haers P; Wertheim D; Greenhill D
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Mar; 36(3):250-8. PubMed ID: 17113754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-simulated bi-directional alveolar distraction osteogenesis.
Kanno T; Mitsugi M; Sukegawa S; Hosoe M; Furuki Y
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1211-8. PubMed ID: 19040435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
