247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17590161)
1. Oral rehabilitation using Camlog screw-cylinder implants with a particle-blasted and acid-etched microstructured surface. Results from a prospective study with special consideration of short implants.
Strietzel FP; Reichart PA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):591-600. PubMed ID: 17590161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of dental implants after staged sinus floor elevation procedures: 5-year results of a prospective study in partially edentulous patients.
Bornstein MM; Chappuis V; von Arx T; Buser D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1034-43. PubMed ID: 18828820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Turned, machined versus double-etched dental implants in vivo.
Al-Nawas B; Hangen U; Duschner H; Krummenauer F; Wagner W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):71-8. PubMed ID: 17535330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Private practice results of screw-type tapered implants: survival and evaluation of risk factors.
Mundt T; Mack F; Schwahn C; Biffar R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(4):607-14. PubMed ID: 16955613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A noninterventional study documenting use and success of implants with a new chemically modified titanium surface in daily dental practice.
Luongo G; Oteri G
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 20735267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A retrospective analysis of sandblasted, acid-etched implants with reduced healing times with an observation period of up to 5 years.
Nelson K; Semper W; Hildebrand D; Ozyuvaci H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):726-32. PubMed ID: 18807571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective cohort study of the clinical performance of 1-stage dental implants.
Carr AB; Choi YG; Eckert SE; Desjardins RP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 12814315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Short implants placed one-stage in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective clinical study with 1 to 9 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Rangert B
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Mar; 9(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17362493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year success rate of 831 consecutively placed Zirconia dental implants in humans: a comparison of three different rough surfaces.
Oliva J; Oliva X; Oliva JD
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(2):336-44. PubMed ID: 20369093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Immediate functional loading of TiOblast dental implants in full-arch edentulous maxillae: a 3-year prospective study.
Collaert B; De Bruyn H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Dec; 19(12):1254-60. PubMed ID: 19040440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Multicenter retrospective analysis of wide-neck dental implants for single molar replacement.
Levine RA; Ganeles J; Jaffin RA; Clem DS; Beagle JR; Keller GW
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):736-42. PubMed ID: 17974107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of dental implants with surfaces roughened by anodic oxidation, dual acid-etched implants, and machined implants.
Aalam AA; Nowzari H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(5):793-8. PubMed ID: 16274156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Parallel screw cylinder implants: comparative analysis between immediate loading and two-stage healing of 1,005 dental implants with a 2-year follow up.
Degidi M; Piattelli A; Carinci F
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):151-60. PubMed ID: 16919023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maxillary sinus floor elevation using the (transalveolar) osteotome technique with or without grafting material. Part I: Implant survival and patients' perception.
Pjetursson BE; Rast C; Brägger U; Schmidlin K; Zwahlen M; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 19486079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Immediate function with fixed implant-supported maxillary dentures: a 12-month pilot study.
Tealdo T; Bevilacqua M; Pera F; Menini M; Ravera G; Drago C; Pera P
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 May; 99(5):351-60. PubMed ID: 18456046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endosseous implants and bone augmentation in the partially dentate maxilla: an analysis of 17 patients with a follow-up of 29 to 101 months.
Becktor JP; Isaksson S; Sennerby L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):603-8. PubMed ID: 17929521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short (8-mm) dental implants in the rehabilitation of partial and complete edentulism: a 3- to 14-year longitudinal study.
Romeo E; Ghisolfi M; Rozza R; Chiapasco M; Lops D
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):586-92. PubMed ID: 17165298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dental implants in patients with orofacial clefts: a long-term follow-up study.
Kramer FJ; Baethge C; Swennen G; Bremer B; Schwestka-Polly R; Dempf R
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 34(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 16157247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective clinical evaluation of 1920 Morse taper connection implants: results after 4 years of functional loading.
Mangano C; Mangano F; Piattelli A; Iezzi G; Mangano A; La Colla L
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 19397637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
