These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1759145)

  • 1. [The use of laboratory data].
    Keller H
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1991 Dec; 121(50):1861-9. PubMed ID: 1759145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality assurance of analytical methods to guarantee the reliability of medical decision levels for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2004 Jun; 52(6):548-51. PubMed ID: 15283171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The pediatrician, his laboratory and its uncertainty].
    Boulat O
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 2002 Dec; 122(12):645-8. PubMed ID: 12611193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predictive value and efficiency of hematology data.
    Galen RS
    Blood Cells; 1980; 6(2):185-97. PubMed ID: 6769520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Laboratory diagnosis and practical treatment of patients].
    Wagner HA
    Urologe A; 1988 Jan; 27(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 3363770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationships among performance measures in the selection of diagnostic tests.
    Einstein AJ; Bodian CA; Gil J
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Feb; 121(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 9126035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of diagnostic methods used for epidemiological studies of Helicobacter pylori.
    Feldman RA; Evans SJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 1995; 9 Suppl 2():21-31. PubMed ID: 8547524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. What information on quality specifications should be communicated to clinicians, and how?
    Plebani M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):25-35. PubMed ID: 15234633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Improved use of laboratory diagnostic tests].
    Fiedler H; Zimmermann S
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1985 Dec; 40(23):685-90. PubMed ID: 4096050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Interpretation of numerical laboratory values].
    Vonderschmitt DJ
    Ther Umsch; 1995 May; 52(5):306-10. PubMed ID: 7770814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Criteria for the selection and evaluation of diagnostic tests].
    Keller H
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1985 Nov; 40(22):643-8. PubMed ID: 4090554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Allowable limits of analytical error which can guarantee the reliability of reference intervals for interpretation of clinical laboratory data].
    Hosogaya S; Ozaki Y
    Rinsho Byori; 2008 Jul; 56(7):617-21. PubMed ID: 18709995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of the predictive value model in the analysis of test effectiveness.
    Galen RS
    Clin Lab Med; 1982 Dec; 2(4):685-99. PubMed ID: 7160151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A review of theoretical and practical aspects of clinical laboratory testing.
    Nowakowski R
    Optom Clin; 1992; 2(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 1576438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring diagnostic and predictive accuracy in disease management: an introduction to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.
    Linden A
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Apr; 12(2):132-9. PubMed ID: 16579821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Basic statistics for quality control in the clinical laboratory.
    Williams GW; Schork MA
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 1982; 17(2):171-99. PubMed ID: 6751691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Quality specifications and allowable standards for validation of methods used in clinical biochemistry].
    Vassault A; Grafmeyer D; de Graeve J; Cohen R; Beaudonnet A; Bienvenu J
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1999; 57(6):685-95. PubMed ID: 10572217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Precision and accuracy: concepts and assessment by method evaluation testing.
    Westgard JO
    Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci; 1981; 13(4):283-330. PubMed ID: 7016436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of an indirect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the detection of antibody against Brucella abortus in cattle sera using an automated ELISA workstation.
    Paweska JT; Potts AD; Harris HJ; Smith SJ; Viljoen GJ; Dungu B; Brett OL; Bubb M; Prozesky L
    Onderstepoort J Vet Res; 2002 Mar; 69(1):61-77. PubMed ID: 12092779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of instrument error and method agreement.
    Chatburn RL
    AANA J; 1996 Jun; 64(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 9095698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.