260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17591468)
1. Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Josso C; Roman S; Fumex F; Lepilliez V; Prost B; Lot M; Guillaud O; Petit-Laurent F; Lapalus MG; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Jul; 66(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 17591468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prospective randomized trial of transnasal versus peroral endoscopy using an ultrathin videoendoscope in unsedated patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Sumida Y; Yamamoto H; Nakamura K; Nawata H
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Apr; 22(4):482-5. PubMed ID: 17376037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: does it work better through the nose?
Birkner B; Fritz N; Schatke W; Hasford J
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):647-51. PubMed ID: 12929058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self-training in unsedated transnasal EGD by endoscopists competent in standard peroral EGD: prospective assessment of the learning curve.
Maffei M; Dumortier J; Dumonceau JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Mar; 67(3):410-8. PubMed ID: 18155215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD.
Preiss C; Charton JP; Schumacher B; Neuhaus H
Endoscopy; 2003 Aug; 35(8):641-6. PubMed ID: 12929057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Feasibility and tolerance of 2-way and 4-way angulation videoscopes for unsedated patients undergoing transnasal EGD in GI cancer screening.
Tatsumi Y; Harada A; Matsumoto T; Tani T; Nishida H
Gastrointest Endosc; 2008 Jun; 67(7):1021-7. PubMed ID: 18279865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biopsy specimens obtained with small-caliber endoscopes have comparable diagnostic performances than those obtained with conventional endoscopes: a prospective study on 1335 specimens.
Walter T; Chesnay AL; Dumortier J; Mège-LeChevallier F; Hervieu V; Guillaud O; Lapalus MG; Lépilliez V; Fumex F; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2010 Jan; 44(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19661817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Prospective study comparing conventional and transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy for routine diagnosis].
Krakamp B; Parusel M; Saers T
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2004 Jan; 129(3):82-6. PubMed ID: 14724781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Wilkins T; Brewster A; Lammers J
J Fam Pract; 2002 Jul; 51(7):625-9. PubMed ID: 12160501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A prospective randomized comparative study on the safety and tolerability of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy.
Yagi J; Adachi K; Arima N; Tanaka S; Ose T; Azumi T; Sasaki H; Sato M; Kinoshita Y
Endoscopy; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1226-31. PubMed ID: 16329022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: feasibility and study on performance and tolerance.
Dumortier J; Ponchon T; Scoazec JY; Moulinier B; Zarka F; Paliard P; Lambert R
Gastrointest Endosc; 1999 Mar; 49(3 Pt 1):285-91. PubMed ID: 10049409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gauze pledgetting versus endoscopic-guided aerosolized spray for nasal anesthesia before transnasal EGD: a prospective, randomized study.
Hu CT
Gastrointest Endosc; 2010 Jan; 71(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 19748613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unsedated ultrathin upper endoscopy is better than conventional endoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice: a randomized trial.
Trevisani L; Cifalà V; Sartori S; Gilli G; Matarese G; Abbasciano V
World J Gastroenterol; 2007 Feb; 13(6):906-11. PubMed ID: 17352021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective comparative study on the acceptability of unsedated transnasal endoscopy in younger versus older patients.
Murata A; Akahoshi K; Motomura Y; Matsui N; Kubokawa M; Kimura M; Ouchi J; Honda K; Endo S; Nakamura K; Takayanagi R
J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Oct; 42(9):965-8. PubMed ID: 18622302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized prospective trial comparing unsedated esophagoscopy via transnasal and transoral routes using a 4-mm video endoscope with conventional endoscopy with sedation.
Thota PN; Zuccaro G; Vargo JJ; Conwell DL; Dumot JA; Xu M
Endoscopy; 2005 Jun; 37(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15933930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endoscopic-guided versus cotton-tipped applicator methods of nasal anesthesia for transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a randomized, prospective, controlled study.
Hu CT
Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 May; 103(5):1114-21. PubMed ID: 18445099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transnasal endoscopy for the placement of nasoenteral feeding tubes: does the working length of the endoscope matter?
Wildi SM; Gubler C; Vavricka SR; Fried M; Bauerfeind P
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Aug; 66(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 17643693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Esophageal capsule endoscopy versus esophagogastroduodenoscopy for evaluating portal hypertension: a prospective comparative study of performance and tolerance.
Lapalus MG; Dumortier J; Fumex F; Roman S; Lot M; Prost B; Mion F; Ponchon T
Endoscopy; 2006 Jan; 38(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 16429353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
Madhotra R; Mokhashi M; Willner I; Hawes RH; Reuben A
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Apr; 98(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 12738460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients.
Dumortier J; Napoleon B; Hedelius F; Pellissier PE; Leprince E; Pujol B; Ponchon T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2003 Feb; 57(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 12556784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
