These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

358 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17591548)

  • 41. Comparison of tumor volumes derived from glucose metabolic rate maps and SUV maps in dynamic 18F-FDG PET.
    Visser EP; Philippens ME; Kienhorst L; Kaanders JH; Corstens FH; de Geus-Oei LF; Oyen WJ
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Jun; 49(6):892-8. PubMed ID: 18483085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Extraction of time activity curves from gated FDG-PET images for small animals' heart studies.
    Mabrouk R; Dubeau F; Bentourkia M; Bentabet L
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2012 Sep; 36(6):484-91. PubMed ID: 22658459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Quantitative dynamic cardiac 82Rb PET using generalized factor and compartment analyses.
    El Fakhri G; Sitek A; Guérin B; Kijewski MF; Di Carli MF; Moore SC
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Aug; 46(8):1264-71. PubMed ID: 16085581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A new positron emission tomography imaging agent for the serotonin transporter: synthesis, pharmacological characterization, and kinetic analysis of [11C]2-[2-(dimethylaminomethyl)phenylthio]-5-fluoromethylphenylamine ([11C]AFM).
    Huang Y; Hwang DR; Bae SA; Sudo Y; Guo N; Zhu Z; Narendran R; Laruelle M
    Nucl Med Biol; 2004 Jul; 31(5):543-56. PubMed ID: 15219271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Image-derived input function from the vena cava for 18F-FDG PET studies in rats and mice.
    Lanz B; Poitry-Yamate C; Gruetter R
    J Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1380-8. PubMed ID: 24914058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A method to quantify the uptake rate of 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose in tissues.
    Laffon E; Allard M; Marthan R; Ducassou D
    Nucl Med Commun; 2004 Aug; 25(8):851-4. PubMed ID: 15266182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Simplifications in analyzing positron emission tomography data: effects on outcome measures.
    Logan J; Alexoff D; Kriplani A
    Nucl Med Biol; 2007 Oct; 34(7):743-56. PubMed ID: 17921027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Correction for the effect of rising plasma glucose levels on quantification of MR(glc) with FDG-PET.
    Dunn JT; Anthony K; Amiel SA; Marsden PK
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 2009 May; 29(5):1059-67. PubMed ID: 19293824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A computer simulation study on the input function sampling schedules in tracer kinetic modeling with positron emission tomography (PET).
    Feng D; Wang X; Yan H
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 1994 Nov; 45(3):175-86. PubMed ID: 7705075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Diagnostic value of kinetic analysis using dynamic FDG PET in immunocompetent patients with primary CNS lymphoma.
    Nishiyama Y; Yamamoto Y; Monden T; Sasakawa Y; Kawai N; Satoh K; Ohkawa M
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2007 Jan; 34(1):78-86. PubMed ID: 16896670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Rapid scanning protocol for brain (18)F-FDG PET: a validation study.
    Chen WP; Matsunari I; Noda A; Yanase D; Yajima K; Takeda N; Yamada M; Minoshima S; Nishimura S
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Oct; 46(10):1633-41. PubMed ID: 16204713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Performance evaluation of kinetic parameter estimation methods in dynamic FDG-PET studies.
    Dai X; Chen Z; Tian J
    Nucl Med Commun; 2011 Jan; 32(1):4-16. PubMed ID: 21166088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Noninvasive estimation of the input function for dynamic mouse 18F-FDG microPET studies.
    Mu W; Chen Z; Dai X; Tian J
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2013 Nov; 60(11):3103-12. PubMed ID: 23797213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. FDG-PET parametric imaging by total variation minimization.
    Guo H; Renaut RA; Chen K; Reiman E
    Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2009 Jun; 33(4):295-303. PubMed ID: 19261438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Measurement of input functions in rodents: challenges and solutions.
    Laforest R; Sharp TL; Engelbach JA; Fettig NM; Herrero P; Kim J; Lewis JS; Rowland DJ; Tai YC; Welch MJ
    Nucl Med Biol; 2005 Oct; 32(7):679-85. PubMed ID: 16243642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. "Population" approach improves parameter estimation of kinetic models from dynamic PET data.
    Bertoldo A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2004 Mar; 23(3):297-306. PubMed ID: 15027522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Quantitative brain FDG/PET studies using dynamic aortic imaging.
    Dhawan V; Takikawa S; Robeson W; Spetsieris P; Chaly T; Dahl R; Zanzi I; Bandyopadhyay D; Margouleff D; Eidelberg D
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Sep; 39(9):1475-87. PubMed ID: 15552117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Spillover and partial-volume correction for image-derived input functions for small-animal 18F-FDG PET studies.
    Fang YH; Muzic RF
    J Nucl Med; 2008 Apr; 49(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 18344438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Whiskers area as extracerebral reference tissue for quantification of rat brain metabolism using (18)F-FDG PET: application to focal cerebral ischemia.
    Backes H; Walberer M; Endepols H; Neumaier B; Graf R; Wienhard K; Mies G
    J Nucl Med; 2011 Aug; 52(8):1252-60. PubMed ID: 21764786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. An open tool for input function estimation and quantification of dynamic PET FDG brain scans.
    Bertrán M; Martínez N; Carbajal G; Fernández A; Gómez Á
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2016 Aug; 11(8):1419-30. PubMed ID: 26514683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.