These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17592168)

  • 41. A review of tort liability in involuntary civil commitment.
    Knapp S; VandeCreek L
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Jun; 38(6):648-51. PubMed ID: 3596501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Psychiatric patients and AIDS: the forensic clinician perspective.
    Weinstock R; Leong GB; Silva JA
    J Forensic Sci; 1990 May; 35(3):644-52. PubMed ID: 2348181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. How Alberta psychiatrists view commitment criteria and the problem of predicting dangerousness.
    Arboleda-Florez J; Holly H
    Can J Psychiatry; 1984 Feb; 29(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 6704884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [On the relationship between psychiatry and criminal law from a legal standpoint].
    Schöch H
    Nervenarzt; 2005 Nov; 76(11):1382-8. PubMed ID: 16247618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Perceived statutory applicability versus clinical desirability of emergency involuntary hospitalization.
    Peszke MA; Affleck GG; Wintrob RM
    Am J Psychiatry; 1980 Apr; 137(4):476-80. PubMed ID: 7361937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Involuntary outpatient psychiatric care: a timely innovation.
    Weitzel WD
    J Ky Med Assoc; 1984 Oct; 82(10):511-3. PubMed ID: 6389736
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Thirty-five years of working with civil commitment statutes.
    Bloom JD
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2004; 32(4):430-9. PubMed ID: 15704628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Civil commitment and the criminal insanity plea in Israeli law.
    Toib JA
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(4):308-18. PubMed ID: 18374417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assisted outpatient treatment for mental illness.
    Herman M
    NCSL Legisbrief; 2004 Oct; 12(40):1-2. PubMed ID: 15503423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Compliance with psychiatric legal ordinance section 63 STGB. Legal principles--current status--treatment concepts--perspectives].
    Nedopil N; Müller-Isberner R
    Nervenarzt; 1995 Nov; 66(11):793-801. PubMed ID: 8532095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Involuntary outpatient commitment in Arizona: a retrospective study.
    Van Putten RA; Santiago JM; Berren MR
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1988 Sep; 39(9):953-8. PubMed ID: 3215643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Involuntary admission and the attitude of the general population, and mental health professionals].
    Lauber C; Rössler W
    Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Apr; 34 Suppl 2():S181-5. PubMed ID: 17394107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Is there a reason to criminalize psychiatric patients to create treatment facilities for them?].
    Graf M; Eichhorn M
    Psychiatr Prax; 2003 Apr; 30(3):105-7. PubMed ID: 12692734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Psychiatrists' duty to the public: protection from dangerous patients.
    Poltz JT
    Univ Ill Law Forum; 1976; 1976(4):1103-28. PubMed ID: 11664786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An empirical comparison of the stone and dangerousness criteria for civil commitment.
    Hoge SK; Appelbaum PS; Greer A
    Am J Psychiatry; 1989 Feb; 146(2):170-5. PubMed ID: 2912258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Expert opinions of forensic psychiatrists regarding laws of subsequent preventive detention].
    Basdekis-Jozsa R; Briken P
    Psychiatr Prax; 2012 Aug; 39(6):293-5. PubMed ID: 22926794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. On the justification for civil commitment.
    Høyer G
    Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl; 2000; 399():65-71. PubMed ID: 10794032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Interaction of the criminal justice system and psychiatric professionals in which civil commitment standards are prohibitive.
    Solomon P; Rogers R; Draine J; Meyerson A
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1995; 23(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 7599364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Survey of forensic psychiatrists on evaluation and treatment of prisoners on death row.
    Leong GB; Silva JA; Weinstock R; Ganzini L
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2000; 28(4):427-32. PubMed ID: 11196252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Obligatory dangerousness criteria in the involuntary commitment and treatment provisions of Australian mental health legislation.
    King R; Robinson J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2011; 34(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 21112634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.