These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17592197)

  • 1. Reducing ventricular pacing in sinus node dysfunction.
    Ishikawa T; Sumita S; Kosuge M; Giese C; Markowitz T; Tsunoda S; Uchino K; Kobayashi T; Matsushita K; Inoue N; Matsushita K; Taima M; Kimura K; Umemura S
    Int Heart J; 2007 May; 48(3):323-36. PubMed ID: 17592197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reduction of right ventricular pacing in patients with sinus node dysfunction through programming a long atrioventricular delay along with the DDIR mode.
    Nitardy A; Langreck H; Dietz R; Stockburger M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2009 Jan; 98(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18853096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of life in patients with complete heart block and paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias: a comparison of permanent DDIR versus DDDR pacing with mode switch to DDIR.
    Provenier F; Boudrez H; Deharo JC; Djiane P; Jordaens L
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Mar; 22(3):462-8. PubMed ID: 10192855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Initial experience with a new algorithm for automatic mode switching from DDDR to DDIR mode.
    Ovsyshcher IE; Katz A; Bondy C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1994 Nov; 17(11 Pt 2):1908-12. PubMed ID: 7845790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improved cardiac function and quality of life following upgrade to dual chamber pacing after long-term ventricular stimulation.
    Höijer CJ; Brandt J; Willenheimer R; Juul-Möller S; Boström PA
    Eur Heart J; 2002 Mar; 23(6):490-7. PubMed ID: 11863352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in the bradycardia tachycardia syndrome: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover trial.
    Schwaab B; Kindermann M; Schätzer-Klotz D; Berg M; Franow H; Fröhlig G; Schieffer H
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2001 Nov; 24(11):1585-95. PubMed ID: 11816626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A randomized double-blind crossover comparison of four rate-responsive pacing modes.
    Sulke N; Chambers J; Dritsas A; Sowton E
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1991 Mar; 17(3):696-706. PubMed ID: 1993790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rate adaptive pacing in sick sinus syndrome: effects of pacing modes and intrinsic conduction on physiological responses, arrhythmias, symptomatology and quality of life.
    Lau CP; Tai YT; Leung WH; Wong CK; Lee P; Chung FL
    Eur Heart J; 1994 Nov; 15(11):1445-55. PubMed ID: 7835358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mode-switching algorithms: programming and usefulness].
    Israel CW
    Herz; 2001 Feb; 26(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 11258106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. DDIR versus VVIR pacing in patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmias.
    Vanerio G; Maloney JD; Pinski SL; Simmons TW; Castle LW; Trohman RG; Wilkoff BL
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 1):1630-8. PubMed ID: 1721153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance of atrial tachyarrhythmia-sensing algorithms in dual-chamber pacing using a fixed long AV delay in patients with sinus node dysfunction.
    Pakarinen S; Toivonen L
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2012 Nov; 35(2):207-13. PubMed ID: 22688950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of AAIR versus DDDR pacing for patients with sinus node dysfunction: a long-term follow-up study.
    Mutagaywa RK; Tumaini B; Chin A
    Cardiovasc J Afr; 2021 Jan-Feb 23; 32(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 32946543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early clinical experience with a minute ventilation sensor DDDR pacemaker.
    Vanerio G; Patel S; Ching E; Trohman RG; Wilkoff BL; Castle LW; Maloney JD; Simmons TW
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1991 Nov; 14(11 Pt 2):1815-20. PubMed ID: 1721181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AAIR versus DDDR pacing in patients with impaired sinus node chronotropy: an echocardiographic and cardiopulmonary study.
    Vardas PE; Simantirakis EN; Parthenakis FI; Chrysostomakis SI; Skalidis EI; Zuridakis EG
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Jul; 20(7):1762-8. PubMed ID: 9249829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of a new algorithm for automatic mode switching from DDDR to DDIR pacing mode in sinus node disease patients with chronotropic incompetence and recurrent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
    Ricci R; Puglisi A; Azzolini P; Spampinato A; Pignalberi C; Bellocci F; Adinolfi E; Dini P; Cavaglià S; De Seta F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1996 Nov; 19(11 Pt 2):1719-23. PubMed ID: 8945030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term haemodynamic and antiarrhythmic benefits of DDIR versus DDI pacing mode in sick sinus syndrome and chronotropic incompetence.
    Santini M; Ricci R; Puglisi A; Mangiameli S; Proclemer A; Menozzi C; De Fabrizio G; Leoni G; Lisi F; De Seta F
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Sep; 27(9):892-900. PubMed ID: 9378194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. DDD(R) pacing with automatic mode switch in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation following AV nodal ablation.
    Schuchert A; van Langen H; Michels K; Meinertz T
    Cardiology; 1997; 88(4):323-7. PubMed ID: 9197425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy and safety of bipolar sensing with high atrial sensitivity in dual chamber pacemakers.
    Wiegand UK; Bode F; Peters W; Haase H; Bonnemeier H; Katus HA; Potratz J
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2000 Apr; 23(4 Pt 1):427-33. PubMed ID: 10793429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reducing unnecessary right ventricular pacing with the managed ventricular pacing mode in patients with sinus node disease and AV block.
    Gillis AM; Pürerfellner H; Israel CW; Sunthorn H; Kacet S; Anelli-Monti M; Tang F; Young M; Boriani G;
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jul; 29(7):697-705. PubMed ID: 16884504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction.
    Sweeney MO; Hellkamp AS; Ellenbogen KA; Greenspon AJ; Freedman RA; Lee KL; Lamas GA;
    Circulation; 2003 Jun; 107(23):2932-7. PubMed ID: 12782566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.