These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Reporting peer review actions to the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. Young MG Tex Med; 1989 Jan; 85(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 2922688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Disciplining doctors in Texas: the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. Greenhill J; Starr DS Tex Med; 1990 Sep; 86(9):29-30. PubMed ID: 2218950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Medical practice analysis. Rogers JA J Med Soc N J; 1975 Apr; 72(4):329-31. PubMed ID: 1055265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Some problems in assuring the professional competence of physicians. Watts MS Calif Med; 1973 Aug; 119(2):71-2. PubMed ID: 4726954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Board trouble. What activities attract the attention of the Texas State Board of Medical Examiners. Moran T Tex Med; 1995 May; 91(5):14-7. PubMed ID: 7778046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comment on the doctor and hospital responsibility. Miller JM Md Med J; 1990 Mar; 39(3):279-80. PubMed ID: 2319915 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Veterinary Medical National Board Examination and professional licensure for practice. Hooper BE J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1980 Dec; 177(11):1092-6. PubMed ID: 7440309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Regulation by the Board of Medicine. Grossman AR J Fla Med Assoc; 1997 Feb; 84(2):97-100. PubMed ID: 9066234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Complaint review process of the Board of Medical Examiners. Paris BD; Stratas NE N C Med J; 1992 Jan; 53(1):15-6. PubMed ID: 1549185 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The corporate practice of medicine, revisited. Wilcox DP Tex Med; 1986 Dec; 82(12):71-2. PubMed ID: 3810505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A look at nursing peer review, delegation rules. Waddill L Tex Hosp; 1988 Sep; 44(4):35-7. PubMed ID: 10290477 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How about some teeth for the State Board? Anderson CF Tex Dent J; 2009 Feb; 126(2):140-1. PubMed ID: 19280905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Rigorous standards, training are right route. Weller WW CDS Rev; 2009; 102(1):6. PubMed ID: 19260201 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reciprocity, credentials, or the same old politics? Lyman DR; Lyman SM; Quarles D Gen Dent; 1995; 43(5):476-7. PubMed ID: 8941744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Peer review in review (or, how to avoid tangling with the Board of Dental Examiners). Zimmerman BJ J Colo Dent Assoc; 1995 Jan; 73(3):18-9. PubMed ID: 9470589 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Point: should CRNAs in nontraditional clinical worksettings be subject to mandatory peer review of their clinical practice? Vercellino CE Nurse Anesth; 1991 Jun; 2(2):59-60; discussion 61-4. PubMed ID: 2043687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of controlled trials on the practice of medicine. Chalmers TC Mt Sinai J Med; 1974; 41(6):753-9. PubMed ID: 4547818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]