These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17592424)

  • 21. Stentless valves versus stented bioprostheses at the aortic position: midterm results.
    Narang S; Satsangi DK; Banerjee A; Geelani MA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Oct; 136(4):943-7. PubMed ID: 18954634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Kangaroo versus freestyle stentless bioprostheses in a juvenile sheep model: hemodynamic performance and calcification behavior.
    Neethling WM; Hodge AJ; Glancy R
    J Card Surg; 2005; 20(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 15673407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Aortic valve replacement in patients aged 50 to 70 years: improved outcome with mechanical versus biologic prostheses.
    Brown ML; Schaff HV; Lahr BD; Mullany CJ; Sundt TM; Dearani JA; McGregor CG; Orszulak TA
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 135(4):878-84; discussion 884. PubMed ID: 18374773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stentless aortic valve reoperations: a surgical challenge.
    Borger MA; Prasongsukarn K; Armstrong S; Feindel CM; David TE
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Sep; 84(3):737-43; discussion 743-4. PubMed ID: 17720369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cerebrovascular events after stentless aortic valve replacement during a 9-year follow-up period.
    Gulbins H; Florath I; Ennker J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2008 Sep; 86(3):769-73. PubMed ID: 18721558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Surgical management of aortic valve disease in the elderly: A retrospective comparative study of valve choice using propensity score analysis.
    Accola KD; Scott ML; Palmer GJ; Thompson PA; Sand ME; Suarez-Cavalier JE; Bott JN; Ebra G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):355-64; discussion 365. PubMed ID: 18751463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Freedom SOLO valve: superior hemodynamic results with a new stentless pericardial valve for aortic valve replacement.
    Beholz S; Dushe S; Konertz W
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jan; 16(1):49-55; discussion 55. PubMed ID: 17315383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Aortic valve replacement: a prospective randomized evaluation of mechanical versus biological valves in patients ages 55 to 70 years.
    Stassano P; Di Tommaso L; Monaco M; Iorio F; Pepino P; Spampinato N; Vosa C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Nov; 54(20):1862-8. PubMed ID: 19892237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Seven-year performance of the Edwards Prima Plus stentless valve with the intact non-coronary sinus technique.
    Luciani GB; Viscardi F; Cresce GD; Faggian G; Mazzucco A
    J Card Surg; 2008; 23(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 18435636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Thrombocytopenia after aortic valve replacement with the Freedom Solo stentless bioprosthesis.
    Yerebakan C; Kaminski A; Westphal B; Kundt G; Ugurlucan M; Steinhoff G; Liebold A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Aug; 7(4):616-20. PubMed ID: 18505752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Meta-analysis of valve hemodynamics and left ventricular mass regression for stentless versus stented aortic valves.
    Kunadian B; Vijayalakshmi K; Thornley AR; de Belder MA; Hunter S; Kendall S; Graham R; Stewart M; Thambyrajah J; Dunning J
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2007 Jul; 84(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 17588387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Predicted patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Stentless Freestyle bioprostheses.
    Kappetein AP; Puvimanasinghe JP; Takkenberg JJ; Steyerberg EW; Bogers AJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jul; 16(4):423-8; discussion 429. PubMed ID: 17702369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stentless valves for aortic valve replacement: where do we stand?
    de Kerchove L; Glineur D; El Khoury G; Noirhomme P
    Curr Opin Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 22(2):96-103. PubMed ID: 17284987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Cardiovascular risk factors as predictors of early and late survival after bioprosthetic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Le Tourneau T; Marechaux S; Vincentelli A; Ennezat PV; Modine T; Polge AS; Fayad G; Prat A; Warembourg H; Deklunder G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Sep; 16(5):483-8. PubMed ID: 17944119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ; Eichinger WB; Hettich IM; Bleiziffer S; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Preassembled stentless valved-conduit for the replacement of the ascending aorta and aortic root.
    Bochenek-Klimczyk K; Lau KK; Galiñanes M; Sosnowski AW
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2008 Dec; 7(6):964-8. PubMed ID: 18713779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A randomized comparison of the Cryolife O'Brien and Toronto stentless replacement aortic valves.
    Chambers JB; Rimington HM; Rajani R; Hodson F; Shabbo F
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 133(4):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17382651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of the effects of aortic valve replacement using 19-mm Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis and 19-mm Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis.
    Tanigawa K; Eishi K; Yamachika S; Hashizume K; Tada S; Yamane K; Izumi K; Takai H; Miura T; Nakaji S
    Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Apr; 14(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 18414344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Patient outcome after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical or biological prosthesis: weighing lifetime anticoagulant-related event risk against reoperation risk.
    van Geldorp MW; Eric Jamieson WR; Kappetein AP; Ye J; Fradet GJ; Eijkemans MJ; Grunkemeier GL; Bogers AJ; Takkenberg JJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Apr; 137(4):881-6, 886e1-5. PubMed ID: 19327512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.