254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17593461)
1. Concurrent validity of augmented reality metrics applied to the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS).
Ritter EM; Kindelan TW; Michael C; Pimentel EA; Bowyer MW
Surg Endosc; 2007 Aug; 21(8):1441-5. PubMed ID: 17593461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Beyond task time: automated measurement augments fundamentals of laparoscopic skills methodology.
Kowalewski TM; White LW; Lendvay TS; Jiang IS; Sweet R; Wright A; Hannaford B; Sinanan MN
J Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 192(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 25108691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of the VBLaST: A Virtual Peg Transfer Task in Gynecologic Surgeons.
Awtrey C; Chellali A; Schwaitzberg S; De S; Jones D; Cao C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1271-7. PubMed ID: 26216094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Construct validity of the ProMIS laparoscopic simulator.
Pellen MG; Horgan LF; Barton JR; Attwood SE
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):130-9. PubMed ID: 18648875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validation of three virtual reality Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) modules.
Pitzul KB; Grantcharov TP; Okrainec A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 173():349-55. PubMed ID: 22357016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a web-based laparoscopic technical skills assessment and testing instrument: a pilot study.
Rudderow J; Bansal J; Wearne S; Lara-Torre E; Paget C; Ferrara J
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(6):e73-8. PubMed ID: 25127452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Instrument Motion Metrics for Laparoscopic Skills Assessment in Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality.
Fransson BA; Chen CY; Noyes JA; Ragle CA
Vet Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(S1):O5-O13. PubMed ID: 27239013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Construct validation of the ProMIS simulator using a novel laparoscopic suturing task.
Van Sickle KR; McClusky DA; Gallagher AG; Smith CD
Surg Endosc; 2005 Sep; 19(9):1227-31. PubMed ID: 16025195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Construct validation of a novel hybrid virtual-reality simulator for training and assessing laparoscopic colectomy; results from the first course for experienced senior laparoscopic surgeons.
Neary PC; Boyle E; Delaney CP; Senagore AJ; Keane FB; Gallagher AG
Surg Endosc; 2008 Oct; 22(10):2301-9. PubMed ID: 18553207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experienced surgeons can do more than one thing at a time: effect of distraction on performance of a simple laparoscopic and cognitive task by experienced and novice surgeons.
Hsu KE; Man FY; Gizicki RA; Feldman LS; Fried GM
Surg Endosc; 2008 Jan; 22(1):196-201. PubMed ID: 17705087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time-efficient laparoscopic skills assessment using an augmented-reality simulator.
Oostema JA; Abdel MP; Gould JC
Surg Endosc; 2008 Dec; 22(12):2621-4. PubMed ID: 18347859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Simulation in laparoscopic surgery: a concurrent validity study for FLS.
Xeroulis G; Dubrowski A; Leslie K
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jan; 23(1):161-5. PubMed ID: 18814001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. FLS simulator performance predicts intraoperative laparoscopic skill.
McCluney AL; Vassiliou MC; Kaneva PA; Cao J; Stanbridge DD; Feldman LS; Fried GM
Surg Endosc; 2007 Nov; 21(11):1991-5. PubMed ID: 17593434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Face and construct validation of a virtual peg transfer simulator.
Arikatla VS; Sankaranarayanan G; Ahn W; Chellali A; De S; Caroline GL; Hwabejire J; DeMoya M; Schwaitzberg S; Jones DB
Surg Endosc; 2013 May; 27(5):1721-9. PubMed ID: 23263645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ongoing evaluation of video-based assessment of proctors' scoring of the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery manual skills examination.
Rooney DM; Brissman IC; Gauger PG
J Surg Educ; 2015; 72(3):471-6. PubMed ID: 25863704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does the incorporation of motion metrics into the existing FLS metrics lead to improved skill acquisition on simulators? A single blinded, randomized controlled trial.
Stefanidis D; Yonce TC; Korndorffer JR; Phillips R; Coker A
Ann Surg; 2013 Jul; 258(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 23470570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?
Shanmugan S; Leblanc F; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Stein SL; Khan S; Delaney CP; Champagne BJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24401883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics may not correlate with operative performance in a novice cohort.
Steigerwald SN; Park J; Hardy KM; Gillman L; Vergis AS
Med Educ Online; 2015; 20():30024. PubMed ID: 26641071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Learning rate for laparoscopic surgical skills on MIST VR, a virtual reality simulator: quality of human-computer interface.
Chaudhry A; Sutton C; Wood J; Stone R; McCloy R
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Jul; 81(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10615201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
