These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

254 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17593461)

  • 21. Validation of the VBLaST peg transfer task: a first step toward an alternate training standard.
    Chellali A; Zhang L; Sankaranarayanan G; Arikatla VS; Ahn W; Derevianko A; Schwaitzberg SD; Jones DB; DeMoya M; Cao CG
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2856-62. PubMed ID: 24771197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Construct validity of the LapSim: can the LapSim virtual reality simulator distinguish between novices and experts?
    van Dongen KW; Tournoij E; van der Zee DC; Schijven MP; Broeders IA
    Surg Endosc; 2007 Aug; 21(8):1413-7. PubMed ID: 17294307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
    Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
    J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of construct validity of a virtual reality laparoscopy simulator.
    Rosenthal R; Gantert WA; Hamel C; Hahnloser D; Metzger J; Kocher T; Vogelbach P; Scheidegger D; Oertli D; Clavien PA
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2007 Aug; 17(4):407-13. PubMed ID: 17705717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Face validity study of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic suturing simulator.
    Botden SM; Berlage JT; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
    Surg Technol Int; 2008; 17():26-32. PubMed ID: 18802880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Initial validation of the ProMIS surgical simulator as an objective measure of robotic task performance.
    McDonough PS; Tausch TJ; Peterson AC; Brand TC
    J Robot Surg; 2011 Sep; 5(3):195-9. PubMed ID: 27637707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ProMIS augmented reality training of laparoscopic procedures face validity.
    Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
    Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 19088648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An evidence-based virtual reality training program for novice laparoscopic surgeons.
    Aggarwal R; Grantcharov TP; Eriksen JR; Blirup D; Kristiansen VB; Funch-Jensen P; Darzi A
    Ann Surg; 2006 Aug; 244(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 16858196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Motion Analysis-Based Skills Training and Assessment in Pediatric Laparoscopy: Construct, Concurrent, and Content Validity for the eoSim Simulator.
    Retrosi G; Cundy T; Haddad M; Clarke S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 Nov; 25(11):944-50. PubMed ID: 26259166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Hybrid augmented reality simulator: preliminary construct validation of laparoscopic smoothness in a urology residency program.
    Feifer A; Delisle J; Anidjar M
    J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1455-9. PubMed ID: 18710760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does laparoscopic simulation predict intraoperative performance? A comparison between the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics.
    Steigerwald SN; Park J; Hardy KM; Gillman LM; Vergis AS
    Am J Surg; 2015 Jan; 209(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25454953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Construct and concurrent validity of a Nintendo Wii video game made for training basic laparoscopic skills.
    Jalink MB; Goris J; Heineman E; Pierie JP; ten Cate Hoedemaker HO
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Feb; 28(2):537-42. PubMed ID: 24061627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Proving the value of simulation in laparoscopic surgery.
    Fried GM; Feldman LS; Vassiliou MC; Fraser SA; Stanbridge D; Ghitulescu G; Andrew CG
    Ann Surg; 2004 Sep; 240(3):518-25; discussion 525-8. PubMed ID: 15319723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Objective assessment based on motion-related metrics and technical performance in laparoscopic suturing.
    Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM; Oropesa I; Enciso S; Gómez EJ
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Feb; 12(2):307-314. PubMed ID: 27423649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Validity of using Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) program to assess laparoscopic competence for gynecologists.
    Zheng B; Hur HC; Johnson S; Swanström LL
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Jan; 24(1):152-60. PubMed ID: 19517182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Virtual reality versus box laparoscopic simulators in trainee selection and aptitude testing.
    Hennessey IA; Hewett P
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Aug; 24(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 25077635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [A virtual reality simulator for objective assessment of surgeons' laparoscopic skill].
    Hassan I; Sitter H; Schlosser K; Zielke A; Rothmund M; Gerdes B
    Chirurg; 2005 Feb; 76(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 15368058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of a Novel Inverted Peg Transfer Task: Advancing Beyond the Regular Peg Transfer Task for Surgical Simulation-Based Assessment.
    Abdelrahman AM; Yu D; Lowndes BR; Buckarma EH; Gas BL; Farley DR; Bingener J; Hallbeck MS
    J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(3):836-843. PubMed ID: 29037821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Construct, concurrent, and content validity of the eoSim laparoscopic simulator.
    Hennessey IA; Hewett P
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2013 Oct; 23(10):855-60. PubMed ID: 23968255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.