BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17593561)

  • 1. Manipulation and force as sexual coercion tactics: conceptual and empirical differences.
    Lyndon AE; White JW; Kadlec KM
    Aggress Behav; 2007; 33(4):291-303. PubMed ID: 17593561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Male and female sexual victimization in dating relationships: gender differences in coercion techniques and outcomes.
    Waldner-Haugrud LK; Magruder B
    Violence Vict; 1995; 10(3):203-15. PubMed ID: 8777187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sexual coercion history, calloused sexual beliefs and judgments of sexual coercion in a date rape analogue.
    Bernat JA; Wilson AE; Calhoun KS
    Violence Vict; 1999; 14(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 10418768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experiences with dating aggression and sexual coercion among Polish college students.
    Doroszewicz K; Forbes GB
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Jan; 23(1):58-73. PubMed ID: 18087032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. College women's experiences of sexual coercion: a review of cultural, perpetrator, victim, and situational variables.
    Adams-Curtis LE; Forbes GB
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2004 Apr; 5(2):91-122. PubMed ID: 15070552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are all perpetrators alike? Comparing risk factors for sexual coercion and aggression.
    DeGue S; DiLillo D; Scalora M
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):402-26. PubMed ID: 20693517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Covariation in the use of physical and sexual intimate partner aggression among adolescent and college-age men: a longitudinal analysis.
    White JW; Smith PH
    Violence Against Women; 2009 Jan; 15(1):24-43. PubMed ID: 19015389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Coercive sexual strategies.
    Tyler KA; Hoyt DR; Whitbeck LB
    Violence Vict; 1998; 13(1):47-61. PubMed ID: 9650245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dating aggression, sexual coercion, and aggression-supporting attitudes among college men as a function of participation in aggressive high school sports.
    Forbes GB; Adams-Curtis LE; Pakalka AH; White KB
    Violence Against Women; 2006 May; 12(5):441-55. PubMed ID: 16617170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sexual coercion in men and women: similar behaviors, different predictors.
    Schatzel-Murphy EA; Harris DA; Knight RA; Milburn MA
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):974-86. PubMed ID: 19330440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patterns of sexual coercion in heterosexual and non-heterosexual men and women.
    VanderLaan DP; Vasey PL
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Dec; 38(6):987-99. PubMed ID: 19219543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sexual insistence and disliked sexual activities in young adulthood: differences by gender and relationship characteristics.
    Elizabeth Kaestle C
    Perspect Sex Reprod Health; 2009 Mar; 41(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 19291127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining childhood abuse patterns and sensitive periods in juvenile sexual offenders.
    Grabell AS; Knight RA
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Jun; 21(2):208-22. PubMed ID: 19351968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Positive and negative cognitions of sexual submission: relationship to sexual violence.
    Renaud CA; Byers SE
    Arch Sex Behav; 2006 Aug; 35(4):483-90. PubMed ID: 16909319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maltreatment history and weapon carrying among early adolescents.
    Lewis T; Leeb R; Kotch J; Smith J; Thompson R; Black MM; Pelaez-Merrick M; Briggs E; Coyne-Beasley T
    Child Maltreat; 2007 Aug; 12(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 17631625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sexuality, substance use, and susceptibility to victimization: risk for rape and sexual coercion in a prospective study of college women.
    Messman-Moore TL; Coates AA; Gaffey KJ; Johnson CF
    J Interpers Violence; 2008 Dec; 23(12):1730-46. PubMed ID: 18349349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sexual coercion in intimate relationships: a comparative analysis of the effects of women's infidelity and men's dominance and control.
    Goetz AT; Shackelford TK
    Arch Sex Behav; 2009 Apr; 38(2):226-34. PubMed ID: 18415011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Alcohol consumption and perceived sexual coercion: effects of gender and personality determinants.
    Bartolucci AD; Zeichner A; Miller JD
    Subst Use Misuse; 2009; 44(9-10):1399-414. PubMed ID: 19938924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Individual differences in the propensity for partner sexual coercion.
    Camilleri JA; Quinsey VL
    Sex Abuse; 2009 Mar; 21(1):111-29. PubMed ID: 19218481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tactics of sexual coercion: when men and women won't take no for an answer.
    Struckman-Johnson C; Struckman-Johnson D; Anderson PB
    J Sex Res; 2003 Feb; 40(1):76-86. PubMed ID: 12806533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.