These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17593896)

  • 21. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 6: PRISMA-CI extension statement and checklist.
    Guise JM; Butler ME; Chang C; Viswanathan M; Pigott T; Tugwell P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():43-50. PubMed ID: 28720516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improving the quality of the evidence - The necessity to lead by example.
    Simons M; Busch K; Avolio A; Kiat H; Davidson A
    J Clin Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 46():165-166. PubMed ID: 28974392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. How to write a systematic review.
    Harris JD; Quatman CE; Manring MM; Siston RA; Flanigan DC
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Nov; 42(11):2761-8. PubMed ID: 23925575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. PRISMA statement.
    Moher D; Altman DG; Liberati A; Tetzlaff J
    Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):128; author reply 128. PubMed ID: 21150360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Which estimates comprise optimal reporting in Systematic Reviews?
    Stovitz SD; Shrier I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():140. PubMed ID: 27394674
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Scope for improvement in the quality of reporting of systematic reviews. From the Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group.
    Shea B; Bouter LM; Grimshaw JM; Francis D; Ortiz Z; Wells GA; Tugwell PS; Boers M
    J Rheumatol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 16267878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. RE: Which estimates comprise optimal reporting in systematic reviews?
    Alonso-Coello P; Vernooij RW; Carrasco-Labra A; Vandvik P; Guyatt GH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 81():140-141. PubMed ID: 28215276
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The PRISMA statement: a guideline for systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Swartz MK
    J Pediatr Health Care; 2011; 25(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 21147401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement and publication bias.
    Knobloch K; Yoon U; Vogt PM
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 39(2):91-2. PubMed ID: 21145753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [PRISMA declaration: a proposal to improve the publication of systematic reviews and meta-analyses].
    Urrútia G; Bonfill X
    Med Clin (Barc); 2010 Oct; 135(11):507-11. PubMed ID: 20206945
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Evaluation of methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: AMSTAR (A Measurement Tool for the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews)].
    Coenen M; Schuetz GM; Dewey M
    Rofo; 2013 Sep; 184(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 23999778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The scatter of research: cross sectional comparison of randomised trials and systematic reviews across specialties.
    Hoffmann T; Erueti C; Thorning S; Glasziou P
    BMJ; 2012 May; 344():e3223. PubMed ID: 22597353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The evidence base of taming continuously proliferating evidence.
    Knottnerus JA; Tugwell P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Dec; 65(12):1241-2. PubMed ID: 23083676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Editorial: Updated guidance on human genome epidemiology (HuGE) reviews and meta-analyses of genetic associations.
    Gwinn M; Ioannidis JP; Little J; Khoury MJ
    Am J Epidemiol; 2014 Sep; 180(6):559-61. PubMed ID: 25164421
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Systematic reviews: the case for rigorous methods and rigorous reporting.
    Cook D
    Can J Anaesth; 1997 Apr; 44(4):350-3. PubMed ID: 9104514
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Bringing clarity to the reporting of health equity.
    PLOS Medicine Editors
    PLoS Med; 2012 Oct; 9(10):e1001334. PubMed ID: 23133340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting.
    McInnes M; Tunis AS
    Radiology; 2014 Jul; 272(1):303-4. PubMed ID: 24956054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews.
    Wong G; Greenhalgh T; Westhorp G; Buckingham J; Pawson R
    J Adv Nurs; 2013 May; 69(5):987-1004. PubMed ID: 23356699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. AHRQ series on complex intervention systematic reviews-paper 7: PRISMA-CI elaboration and explanation.
    Guise JM; Butler M; Chang C; Viswanathan M; Pigott T; Tugwell P;
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Oct; 90():51-58. PubMed ID: 28720513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.