584 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594384)
1. Which mechanical and physical testing methods are relevant for predicting the clinical performance of ceramic-based dental prostheses?
Anusavice KJ; Kakar K; Ferree N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():218-31. PubMed ID: 17594384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses.
Sailer I; Strasding M; Valente NA; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Pjetursson BE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():184-198. PubMed ID: 30328185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Standardizing failure, success, and survival decisions in clinical studies of ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses.
Anusavice KJ
Dent Mater; 2012 Jan; 28(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 22192254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of Cyclic Fatigue Tests on Aging and Their Translational Implications for Survival of All-Ceramic Tooth-Borne Single Crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Özcan M; Jonasch M
J Prosthodont; 2018 Apr; 27(4):364-375. PubMed ID: 27880023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.
Poggio CE; Ercoli C; Rispoli L; Maiorana C; Esposito M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD009606. PubMed ID: 29261853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs.
Pjetursson BE; Sailer I; Makarov NA; Zwahlen M; Thoma DS
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):624-39. PubMed ID: 25935732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs).
Sailer I; Makarov NA; Thoma DS; Zwahlen M; Pjetursson BE
Dent Mater; 2015 Jun; 31(6):603-23. PubMed ID: 25842099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical success of tooth- and implant-supported zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review.
Le M; Papia E; Larsson C
J Oral Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 42(6):467-80. PubMed ID: 25580846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
Rammelsberg P; Schwarz S; Schroeder C; Bermejo JL; Gabbert O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):758-62. PubMed ID: 22568699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure.
Kinsel RP; Lin D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Jun; 101(6):388-94. PubMed ID: 19463666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of all-ceramic and metal-ceramic reconstructions after an observation period of at least 3 years. Part II: Fixed dental prostheses.
Sailer I; Pjetursson BE; Zwahlen M; Hämmerle CH
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18 Suppl 3():86-96. PubMed ID: 17594373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic single crowns.
Pjetursson BE; Valente NA; Strasding M; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Sailer I
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():199-214. PubMed ID: 30328190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical outcomes of partial and full-arch all-ceramic implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Pieralli S; Kohal RJ; Rabel K; von Stein-Lausnitz M; Vach K; Spies BC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 18():224-236. PubMed ID: 30306694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outcome of bonded vs all-ceramic and metal- ceramic fixed prostheses for single tooth replacement.
Karl M
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9 Suppl 1():S25-44. PubMed ID: 27314110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A critical appraisal of the survival and complication rates of tooth-supported all-ceramic and metal-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: the application of evidence-based dentistry.
Layton D
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):417-27. PubMed ID: 21909482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.
Vigolo P; Mutinelli S
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 22339945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Proof testing to improve the reliability and lifetime of ceramic dental prostheses.
Jadaan O; Esquivel-Upshaw J; Nemeth NN; Baker E
Dent Mater; 2023 Feb; 39(2):227-234. PubMed ID: 36707313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical outcomes of single crown and 3-unit bi-layered zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses: An upto 6- year retrospective clinical study: Clinical outcomes of zirconia FDPs.
Alfadhli R; Alshammari Y; Baig MR; Omar R
J Dent; 2022 Dec; 127():104321. PubMed ID: 36220517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical comparison of metal ceramic resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses with a conventional and a mixed retainer design.
Boemicke W; Kappel S; Stober T; Rammelsberg P
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):472-80. PubMed ID: 24912399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrievable metal ceramic implant-supported fixed prostheses with milled titanium frameworks and all-ceramic crowns: retrospective clinical study with up to 10 years of follow-up.
Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M; Borges J; Almeida R
J Prosthodont; 2012 Jun; 21(4):256-64. PubMed ID: 22339902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
