These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594544)

  • 1. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design.
    Wood L; Hassell A; Whitehouse A; Bullock A; Wall D
    Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):e185-91. PubMed ID: 17594544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: does one size fit all?
    Mackillop LH; Crossley J; Vivekananda-Schmidt P; Wade W; Armitage M
    Med Teach; 2011; 33(2):e75-83. PubMed ID: 21275537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interpreting multisource feedback: online study of consensus and variation among GP appraisers.
    Wright C; Campbell J; McGowan L; Roberts MJ; Jelley D; Chatterjee A
    Br J Gen Pract; 2016 Apr; 66(645):e277-84. PubMed ID: 26965027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physician competencies.
    Lockyer J
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2003; 23(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 12739254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What is a good general practitioner (GP)? The development and evaluation of a multi-source feedback instrument for GP appraisal.
    Shepherd A; Lough M
    Educ Prim Care; 2010 May; 21(3):149-64. PubMed ID: 20515544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers' perspectives.
    Overeem K; Lombarts MJ; Arah OA; Klazinga NS; Grol RP; Wollersheim HC
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 20163230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Factors that might undermine the validity of patient and multi-source feedback.
    Archer JC; McAvoy P
    Med Educ; 2011 Sep; 45(9):886-93. PubMed ID: 21848716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing the effectiveness of multisource feedback in improving the professional practice of medical doctors: a systematic review.
    Ferguson J; Wakeling J; Bowie P
    BMC Med Educ; 2014 Apr; 14():76. PubMed ID: 24725268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of rating scales on scores given to junior doctors in multi-source feedback.
    Hassell A; Bullock A; Whitehouse A; Wood L; Jones P; Wall D
    Postgrad Med J; 2012 Jan; 88(1035):10-4. PubMed ID: 22052883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementing workplace-based assessment across the medical specialties in the United Kingdom.
    Wilkinson JR; Crossley JG; Wragg A; Mills P; Cowan G; Wade W
    Med Educ; 2008 Apr; 42(4):364-73. PubMed ID: 18338989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multisource feedback in evaluating the performance of doctors: the example of the UK General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires.
    Wright C; Richards SH; Hill JJ; Roberts MJ; Norman GR; Greco M; Taylor MR; Campbell JL
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1668-78. PubMed ID: 23095930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of multisource feedback in competency-based assessment programs: the effects of multiple occasions and assessor groups.
    Moonen-van Loon JM; Overeem K; Govaerts MJ; Verhoeven BH; van der Vleuten CP; Driessen EW
    Acad Med; 2015 Aug; 90(8):1093-9. PubMed ID: 25993283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Self-other agreement in multisource feedback: the influence of doctor and rater group characteristics.
    Roberts MJ; Campbell JL; Richards SH; Wright C
    J Contin Educ Health Prof; 2013; 33(1):14-23. PubMed ID: 23512556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commentary: the role of appraisal and multisource feedback in the UK General Medical Council's new revalidation system.
    Rubin P
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1654-6. PubMed ID: 23187912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multisource feedback to assess surgical practice: a systematic review.
    Al Khalifa K; Al Ansari A; Violato C; Donnon T
    J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(4):475-86. PubMed ID: 23725935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Getting the questions right: non-compound questions are more reliable than compound questions on matched multi-source feedback instruments.
    Mackillop L; Parker-Swift J; Crossley J
    Med Educ; 2011 Aug; 45(8):843-8. PubMed ID: 21752081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Implementing medical revalidation in the United Kingdom: Findings about organisational changes and impacts from a survey of Responsible Officers.
    Walshe K; Boyd A; Bryce M; Luscombe K; Tazzyman A; Tredinnick-Rowe J; Archer J
    J R Soc Med; 2017 Jan; 110(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 28084166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of multi-source feedback on developmental plans for leaders of postgraduate medical education.
    Malling B; Bonderup T; Mortensen L; Ringsted C; Scherpbier A
    Med Educ; 2009 Feb; 43(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 19161487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Designing a system for performance appraisal: balancing physicians' accountability and professional development.
    Bindels E; Boerebach B; Scheepers R; Nooteboom A; Scherpbier A; Heeneman S; Lombarts K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2021 Aug; 21(1):800. PubMed ID: 34384410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Commentary: realizing the formative potential of multisource feedback in regulatory-based assessment programs.
    Holmboe ES; Ross K
    Acad Med; 2012 Dec; 87(12):1657-9. PubMed ID: 23187913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.