BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594561)

  • 1. Innovative learning: employing medical students to write formative assessments.
    Chamberlain S; Freeman A; Oldham J; Sanders D; Hudson N; Ricketts C
    Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):656-9. PubMed ID: 17594561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Medical school 2.0: How we developed a student-generated question bank using small group learning.
    Gooi AC; Sommerfeld CS
    Med Teach; 2015; 37(10):892-6. PubMed ID: 25310243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Creating assessments as an active learning strategy: what are students' perceptions? A mixed methods study.
    Kurtz JB; Lourie MA; Holman EE; Grob KL; Monrad SU
    Med Educ Online; 2019 Dec; 24(1):1630239. PubMed ID: 31248355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. To quiz or not to quiz: Formative tests help detect students at risk of failing the clinical anatomy course.
    Azzi AJ; Ramnanan CJ; Smith J; Dionne É; Jalali A
    Anat Sci Educ; 2015; 8(5):413-20. PubMed ID: 25227111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crowdsourcing for assessment items to support adaptive learning.
    Tackett S; Raymond M; Desai R; Haist SA; Morales A; Gaglani S; Clyman SG
    Med Teach; 2018 Aug; 40(8):838-841. PubMed ID: 30096987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pause 2 Learn: a 'learning to learn' course to help undergraduate medical students to become more effective self-regulated learners.
    Sandars J; Homer M
    Educ Prim Care; 2012 Nov; 23(6):437-9. PubMed ID: 23232136
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evaluation of a peer-led question-writing task.
    Nwosu A; Mason S; Roberts A; Hugel H
    Clin Teach; 2013 Jun; 10(3):151-4. PubMed ID: 23656675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maturational differences in undergraduate medical students' perceptions about feedback.
    Murdoch-Eaton D; Sargeant J
    Med Educ; 2012 Jul; 46(7):711-21. PubMed ID: 22691150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
    Luetsch K; Burrows J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fun, collaboration and formative assessment: skinquizition, a class wide gaming competition in a medical school with a large class.
    Schlegel EF; Selfridge NJ
    Med Teach; 2014 May; 36(5):447-9. PubMed ID: 24571695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Educational impact of an assessment of medical students' collaboration in health care teams.
    Olupeliyawa A; Balasooriya C; Hughes C; O'Sullivan A
    Med Educ; 2014 Feb; 48(2):146-56. PubMed ID: 24528397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Formative student-authored question bank: perceptions, question quality and association with summative performance.
    Walsh JL; Harris BHL; Denny P; Smith P
    Postgrad Med J; 2018 Feb; 94(1108):97-103. PubMed ID: 28866607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Training Medical Students to Create and Collaboratively Review Multiple-Choice Questions: A Comprehensive Workshop.
    Kurtz J; Holman B; Monrad SU
    MedEdPORTAL; 2020 Oct; 16():10986. PubMed ID: 33083537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can STEEM be used to measure the educational environment within the operating theatre for undergraduate medical students?
    Nagraj S; Wall D; Jones E
    Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):642-7. PubMed ID: 17594557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Students generating questions for their own written examinations.
    Papinczak T; Babri AS; Peterson R; Kippers V; Wilkinson D
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2011 Dec; 16(5):703-10. PubMed ID: 19757127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical students' perceptions of the situational judgement test: a mixed methods study.
    Sharma N
    Br J Hosp Med (Lond); 2015 Apr; 76(4):234-8. PubMed ID: 25853355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Educational environment in traditional and innovative medical schools: a study in four undergraduate medical schools.
    Al-Hazimi A; Zaini R; Al-Hyiani A; Hassan N; Gunaid A; Ponnamperuma G; Karunathilake I; Roff S; McAleer S; Davis M
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2004 Jul; 17(2):192-203. PubMed ID: 15763762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early clinical experience: do students learn what we expect?
    Helmich E; Bolhuis S; Laan R; Koopmans R
    Med Educ; 2011 Jul; 45(7):731-40. PubMed ID: 21649706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.