396 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594561)
21. Written feedback on supervised learning events.
Nesbitt A; Pitcher A; James L; Sturrock A; Griffin A
Clin Teach; 2014 Jul; 11(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 24917097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Reflection rubric development: evaluating medical students' reflective writing.
Wald HS; Reis SP; Borkan JM
Med Educ; 2009 Nov; 43(11):1110-1. PubMed ID: 19799722
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Correlation of MCQ and SEQ scores in written undergraduate ophthalmology assessment.
Mahmood H
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Mar; 25(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 25772958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Student selected components: do students learn what teachers think they teach?
Murphy MJ; Seneviratne Rde A; McAleer SP; Remers OJ; Davis MH
Med Teach; 2008; 30(9-10):e175-9. PubMed ID: 19117214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Examination results of medical students with dyslexia.
McKendree J; Snowling MJ
Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 21208263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of the impact of powerpoint and chalkboard in undergraduate medical teaching: an evidence based study.
Meo SA; Shahabuddin S; Al Masri AA; Ahmed SM; Aqil M; Anwer MA; Al-Drees AM
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Jan; 23(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 23286623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Answering questions in a co-created formative exam question bank improves summative exam performance, while students perceive benefits from answering, authoring, and peer discussion: A mixed methods analysis of PeerWise.
Guilding C; Pye RE; Butler S; Atkinson M; Field E
Pharmacol Res Perspect; 2021 Aug; 9(4):e00833. PubMed ID: 34309243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Framework for feedback: the peer mini-clinical examination as a formative assessment tool.
Bennett D; Kelly M; O'Flynn S
Med Educ; 2012 May; 46(5):512. PubMed ID: 22515770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessment of professionalism in integrated curriculum: the faculty's perspective.
Mahboob U; Evans P
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2013 Nov; 23(10):771-4. PubMed ID: 24169382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Small group learning: effect on item analysis and accuracy of self-assessment of medical students.
Biswas SS; Jain V; Agrawal V; Bindra M
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26261109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Introduction of regular formative assessment to enhance learning for clinical students at Muhimbili University College, Tanzania.
Mkony CA; Mbembati NA; Hamudu NA; Pallangyo K
Educ Health (Abingdon); 2007 Nov; 20(3):129. PubMed ID: 18080965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Perception of medical students about formative assessments during clinical courses].
Labarca J; Figueroa C; Huidobro B; Wright AC; Riquelme A; Moreno R
Rev Med Chil; 2014 Sep; 142(9):1193-9. PubMed ID: 25517060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. High-quality learning: harder to achieve than we think?
Mattick K; Knight L
Med Educ; 2007 Jul; 41(7):638-44. PubMed ID: 17614883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Formative assessment can be fun as well as educational.
Hudson JN; Bristow DR
Adv Physiol Educ; 2006 Mar; 30(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 16481607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Case-based learning and multiple choice questioning methods favored by students.
Chéron M; Ademi M; Kraft F; Löffler-Stastka H
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Feb; 16():41. PubMed ID: 26830675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of a novel teaching method based on feedback, activity, individuality and relevance on students' learning.
Edafe O; Brooks WS; Laskar SN; Benjamin MW; Chan P
Int J Med Educ; 2016 Mar; 7():87-92. PubMed ID: 26995588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of student examiner to faculty examiner scoring and feedback in an OSCE.
Moineau G; Power B; Pion AM; Wood TJ; Humphrey-Murto S
Med Educ; 2011 Feb; 45(2):183-91. PubMed ID: 21166691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A novel way to engage medical students in learning gross anatomy at the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine.
DiLullo C
Med Teach; 2006 Nov; 28(7):665-6. PubMed ID: 17594566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Medical students benefit from learning about patient safety in an interprofessional team.
Anderson E; Thorpe L; Heney D; Petersen S
Med Educ; 2009 Jun; 43(6):542-52. PubMed ID: 19493178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical students' initial reports of the educational climate in a single medical school.
Seabrook MA
Med Educ; 2004 Jun; 38(6):659-69. PubMed ID: 15189263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
