These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594629)
1. [Follow-up CT measurement of liver malignoma according to RECIST and WHO vs. volumetry]. Heussel CP; Meier S; Wittelsberger S; Götte H; Mildenberger P; Kauczor HU Rofo; 2007 Sep; 179(9):958-64. PubMed ID: 17594629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Accuracy of liver lesion assessment using automated measurement and segmentation software in biphasic multislice CT (MSCT)]. Puesken M; Juergens KU; Edenfeld A; Buerke B; Seifarth H; Beyer F; Suehling M; Osada N; Heindel W; Wessling J Rofo; 2009 Jan; 181(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 18975251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Imaging response in the primary index lesion and clinical outcomes following transarterial locoregional therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Riaz A; Miller FH; Kulik LM; Nikolaidis P; Yaghmai V; Lewandowski RJ; Mulcahy MF; Ryu RK; Sato KT; Gupta R; Wang E; Baker T; Abecassis M; Benson AB; Nemcek AA; Omary R; Salem R JAMA; 2010 Mar; 303(11):1062-9. PubMed ID: 20233824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Size determination and response assessment of liver metastases with computed tomography--comparison of RECIST and volumetric algorithms. Rothe JH; Grieser C; Lehmkuhl L; Schnapauff D; Fernandez CP; Maurer MH; Mussler A; Hamm B; Denecke T; Steffen IG Eur J Radiol; 2013 Nov; 82(11):1831-9. PubMed ID: 22717124 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of response of pulmonal tumors in 64-slice MDCT. Sohns C; Mangelsdorf J; Sossalla S; Konietschke F; Obenauer S Acta Radiol; 2010 Jun; 51(5):512-21. PubMed ID: 20540683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tumor growth kinetics versus RECIST to assess response to locoregional therapy in breast cancer liver metastases. Seyal AR; Parekh K; Velichko YS; Salem R; Yaghmai V Acad Radiol; 2014 Aug; 21(8):950-7. PubMed ID: 24833565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma after treatment with yttrium-90 microspheres. Keppke AL; Salem R; Reddy D; Huang J; Jin J; Larson AC; Miller FH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Mar; 188(3):768-75. PubMed ID: 17312067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Qualitative radiology assessment of tumor response: does it measure up? Gottlieb RH; Litwin A; Gupta B; Taylor J; Raczyk C; Mashtare T; Wilding G; Fakih M Clin Imaging; 2008; 32(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 18313578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Suitability of semi-automated tumor response assessment of liver metastases using a dedicated software package. Kalkmann J; Ladd SC; de Greiff A; Forsting M; Stattaus J Rofo; 2010 Jul; 182(7):581-8. PubMed ID: 20419616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Tumor response assessment by MRI following stereotactic body radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oldrini G; Huertas A; Renard-Oldrini S; Taste-George H; Vogin G; Laurent V; Salleron J; Henrot P PLoS One; 2017; 12(4):e0176118. PubMed ID: 28441447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. RECIST and WHO criteria evaluation of cervical, thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes in patients with malignant lymphoma: manual versus semi-automated measurement on standard MDCT slices. Keil S; Behrendt FF; Stanzel S; Suehling M; Jost E; Mühlenbruch G; Mahnken A; Günther RW; Das M Rofo; 2009 Sep; 181(9):888-95. PubMed ID: 19582654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT tumor measurement for therapeutic response assessment: comparison of unidimensional, bidimensional, and volumetric techniques initial observations. Prasad SR; Jhaveri KS; Saini S; Hahn PF; Halpern EF; Sumner JE Radiology; 2002 Nov; 225(2):416-9. PubMed ID: 12409574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria are superior to European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria at 1 month follow-up for predicting long-term survival in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer. Shuster A; Huynh TJ; Rajan DK; Marquez MA; Grant DR; Huynh DC; Jaskolka JD J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2013 Jun; 24(6):805-12. PubMed ID: 23562641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Volumetry: an alternative to assess therapy response for malignant pleural mesothelioma? Frauenfelder T; Tutic M; Weder W; Götti RP; Stahel RA; Seifert B; Opitz I Eur Respir J; 2011 Jul; 38(1):162-8. PubMed ID: 21273389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of WHO, RECIST 1.1, EORTC, and PERCIST criteria in the evaluation of treatment response in malignant solid tumors. Aras M; Erdil TY; Dane F; Gungor S; Ones T; Dede F; Inanir S; Turoglu HT Nucl Med Commun; 2016 Jan; 37(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 26440568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Evaluation of a new software tool for the automatic volume calculation of hepatic tumors. First results]. Meier S; Schenk A; Mildenberger P; Bourquain H; Pitton M; Thelen M Rofo; 2004 Feb; 176(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 14872378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors is superior to response evaluation criteria in solid tumors for assessment of responses to sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Takada J; Hidaka H; Nakazawa T; Kondo M; Numata K; Tanaka K; Matsunaga K; Okuse C; Kobayashi S; Morimoto M; Ohkawa S; Koizumi W BMC Res Notes; 2015 Oct; 8():609. PubMed ID: 26502722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liver lesion segmentation in MSCT: effect of slice thickness on segmentation quality, measurement precision and interobserver variability. Puesken M; Buerke B; Fortkamp R; Koch R; Seifarth H; Heindel W; Wessling J Rofo; 2011 Apr; 183(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 21246480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of response evaluation criteria in solid tumors with volumetric measurements for estimation of tumor burden in pancreatic adenocarcinoma and hepatocellular carcinoma. Welsh JL; Bodeker K; Fallon E; Bhatia SK; Buatti JM; Cullen JJ Am J Surg; 2012 Nov; 204(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 22902100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Differential diagnosis of focal liver lesions using contrast-enhanced MRI with SHU 555 A in comparison with unenhanced MRI and multidetector spiral-CT]. Jung G; Poll L; Cohnen M; Saleh A; Vogler H; Wettstein M; Willers R; Mödder U; Koch JA Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1571-7. PubMed ID: 16302139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]