547 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594747)
1. Radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon comparison of retropubic, perineal, and robotic approaches.
Boris RS; Kaul SA; Sarle RC; Stricker HJ
Can J Urol; 2007 Jun; 14(3):3566-70. PubMed ID: 17594747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis.
Rocco B; Matei DV; Melegari S; Ospina JC; Mazzoleni F; Errico G; Mastropasqua M; Santoro L; Detti S; de Cobelli O
BJU Int; 2009 Oct; 104(7):991-5. PubMed ID: 19426191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques.
Krambeck AE; DiMarco DS; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Myers RP; Blute ML; Gettman MT
BJU Int; 2009 Feb; 103(4):448-53. PubMed ID: 18778350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparative evaluation of radical retropubic and perineal prostatectomy approaches for prostate cancer.
Zuo W; Hiraoka Y
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2003 Jan; 49(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 12629774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy.
Smith JA; Chan RC; Chang SS; Herrell SD; Clark PE; Baumgartner R; Cookson MS
J Urol; 2007 Dec; 178(6):2385-9; discussion 2389-90. PubMed ID: 17936849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted prostatectomy.
Parsons JK; Bennett JL
Urology; 2008 Aug; 72(2):412-6. PubMed ID: 18267330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bilateral nerve sparing robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy is associated with faster continence recovery but not with erectile function recovery compared with retropubic open prostatectomy: the need for accurate selection of patients.
Ludovico GM; Dachille G; Pagliarulo G; D'Elia C; Mondaini N; Gacci M; Detti B; Malossini G; Bartoletti R; Cai T
Oncol Rep; 2013 Jun; 29(6):2445-50. PubMed ID: 23545628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A direct comparison of robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a single institution experience.
Rozet F; Jaffe J; Braud G; Harmon J; Cathelineau X; Barret E; Vallancien G
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):478-82. PubMed ID: 17561160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost comparison of radical retropubic and radical perineal prostatectomy: single institution experience.
Silverstein AD; Weizer AZ; Dowell JM; Auge BK; Paulson DF; Dahm P
Urology; 2004 Apr; 63(4):746-50. PubMed ID: 15072893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A single-institution comparison between radical perineal and radical retropubic prostatectomy on perioperative and pathological outcomes for obese men: an analysis of the Duke Prostate Center database.
Fitzsimons NJ; Sun LL; Dahm P; Moul JW; Madden J; Gan TJ; Freedland SJ
Urology; 2007 Dec; 70(6):1146-51. PubMed ID: 18158036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes.
Atug F; Castle EP; Srivastav SK; Burgess SV; Thomas R; Davis R
Eur Urol; 2006 May; 49(5):866-71; discussion 871-2. PubMed ID: 16564614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: is one better than the other?
Atug F; Castle EP; Woods M; Srivastav SK; Thomas R; Davis R
Urology; 2006 Nov; 68(5):1077-81. PubMed ID: 17095060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of operative and functional outcomes of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy: single surgeon experience.
Ghavamian R; Knoll A; Boczko J; Melman A
Urology; 2006 Jun; 67(6):1241-6. PubMed ID: 16678887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy: transition from pure laparoscopic to robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Trabulsi EJ; Zola JC; Colon-Herdman A; Heckman JE; Gomella LG; Lallas CD
Arch Esp Urol; 2011 Oct; 64(8):823-9. PubMed ID: 22052763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
Zorn KC; Orvieto MA; Mikhail AA; Gofrit ON; Lin S; Schaeffer AJ; Shalhav AL; Zagaja GP
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):300-5. PubMed ID: 17320668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program?
White MA; De Haan AP; Stephens DD; Maatman TK; Maatman TJ
Urology; 2009 Mar; 73(3):567-71. PubMed ID: 19167036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Financial comparative analysis of minimally invasive surgery to open surgery for localized prostate cancer: a single-institution experience.
Mouraviev V; Nosnik I; Sun L; Robertson CN; Walther P; Albala D; Moul JW; Polascik TJ
Urology; 2007 Feb; 69(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 17320670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Factors determining functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy: robot-assisted versus retropubic.
Kim SC; Song C; Kim W; Kang T; Park J; Jeong IG; Lee S; Cho YM; Ahn H
Eur Urol; 2011 Sep; 60(3):413-9. PubMed ID: 21612859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of initial results with robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy].
Otsuki H; Kuwahara Y; Nakamura K; Tsukamoto T
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2013 Sep; 104(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 24187850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and radical retropubic prostatectomy generate similar positive margin rates in low and intermediate risk patients.
Laurila TA; Huang W; Jarrard DF
Urol Oncol; 2009; 27(5):529-33. PubMed ID: 18640061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
