These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594797)

  • 61. Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience.
    Geng JJ; Mangun GR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1584-601. PubMed ID: 18752405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Expectancies modulate attentional capture by salient color singletons.
    Geyer T; Müller HJ; Krummenacher J
    Vision Res; 2008 May; 48(11):1315-26. PubMed ID: 18407311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The influence of pretarget distracter stream properties on the skeletal attentional blink.
    Janson J; Thorne JD; Kranczioch C
    Neuroreport; 2014 Mar; 25(5):330-4. PubMed ID: 24300308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Emotional modulation of the attentional blink: is there an effect of stress?
    Schwabe L; Wolf OT
    Emotion; 2010 Apr; 10(2):283-8. PubMed ID: 20364906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. The functional architecture of divided visual attention.
    Shapiro K
    Prog Brain Res; 2009; 176():101-21. PubMed ID: 19733752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Irrelevant words trigger an attentional blink.
    Stein T; Zwickel J; Kitzmantel M; Ritter J; Schneider WX
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 20178947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. N250r ERP repetition effects from distractor faces when attending to another face under load: Evidence for a face attention resource.
    Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():64-77. PubMed ID: 19306855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
    Hickey C; Di Lollo V; McDonald JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Apr; 21(4):760-75. PubMed ID: 18564048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Stimulus localization interferes with stimulus recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm.
    Griffiths G; Herwig A; Schneider WX
    J Vis; 2013 Jun; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 23757511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The attentional blink is not affected by backward masking of T2, T2-mask SOA, or level of T2 impoverishment.
    Jannati A; Spalek TM; Lagroix HE; Di Lollo V
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Feb; 38(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 22060143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Target integration and the attentional blink.
    Akyürek EG; Hommel B
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Jul; 119(3):305-14. PubMed ID: 15939028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Capturing attention when attention blinks.
    Wee S; Chua FK; Chua FK
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Jun; 30(3):598-612. PubMed ID: 15161389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode.
    Lamy D; Leber A; Egeth HE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2004 Dec; 30(6):1019-31. PubMed ID: 15584812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Salience is only briefly represented: evidence from probe-detection performance.
    Donk M; Soesman L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Apr; 36(2):286-302. PubMed ID: 20364919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Salient collinear grouping diminishes local salience in visual search: an eye movement study.
    Jingling L; Tang DL; Tseng CH
    J Vis; 2013 Oct; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 24113088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Seeing trees OR seeing forests in simultanagnosia: attentional capture can be local or global.
    Dalrymple KA; Kingstone A; Barton JJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):871-5. PubMed ID: 16973181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Viewpoint costs occur during consolidation: evidence from the attentional blink.
    Dux PE; Harris IM
    Cognition; 2007 Jul; 104(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 16797522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Electrophysiological evidence for both perceptual and postperceptual selection during the attentional blink.
    Giesbrecht B; Sy JL; Elliott JC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2007 Dec; 19(12):2005-18. PubMed ID: 17892389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Suppression of EEG gamma activity may cause the attentional blink.
    Fell J; Klaver P; Elger CE; Fernández G
    Conscious Cogn; 2002 Mar; 11(1):114-22. PubMed ID: 11883991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.