These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594797)

  • 81. Resting EEG in alpha and beta bands predicts individual differences in attentional blink magnitude.
    MacLean MH; Arnell KM; Cote KA
    Brain Cogn; 2012 Apr; 78(3):218-29. PubMed ID: 22281183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Hemispheric modulations of alpha-band power reflect the rightward shift in attention induced by enhanced attentional load.
    Pérez A; Peers PV; Valdés-Sosa M; Galán L; García L; Martínez-Montes E
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18789956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. Reevaluating encoding-capacity limitations as a cause of the attentional blink.
    Dell'acqua R; Jolicoeur P; Luria R; Pluchino P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 19331492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. On why left events are the right ones: neural mechanisms underlying the left-hemifield advantage in rapid serial visual presentation.
    Verleger R; Sprenger A; Gebauer S; Fritzmannova M; Friedrich M; Kraft S; Jaśkowski P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Mar; 21(3):474-88. PubMed ID: 18564053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing.
    Huang YM; Baddeley A; Young AW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):328-39. PubMed ID: 18377174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Electrophysiological evidence of visual encoding deficits in a cross-modal attentional blink paradigm.
    Dell'Acqua R; Jolicoeur P; Pesciarelli F; Job CR; Palomba D
    Psychophysiology; 2003 Jul; 40(4):629-39. PubMed ID: 14570170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Attentional capture triggers an attentional blink.
    Maki WS; Mebane MW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2006 Feb; 13(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 16724779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. The root cause of the attentional blink: first-target processing or disruption of input control?
    Lagroix HE; Spalek TM; Wyble B; Jannati A; Di Lollo V
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Nov; 74(8):1606-22. PubMed ID: 22893006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. No differential attentional blink in dyslexia after controlling for baseline sensitivity.
    Badcock NA; Hogben JH; Fletcher JF
    Vision Res; 2008 Jun; 48(13):1497-502. PubMed ID: 18466946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Attentional capture and engagement during the attentional blink: A "camera" metaphor of attention.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1886-1902. PubMed ID: 27736118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. The attentional blink.
    Shapiro KL; Raymond JE; Arnell KM
    Trends Cogn Sci; 1997 Nov; 1(8):291-6. PubMed ID: 21223931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. A picture says more than a thousand words: behavioural and ERP evidence for attentional enhancements due to action affordances.
    Adamo M; Ferber S
    Neuropsychologia; 2009 May; 47(6):1600-8. PubMed ID: 18682258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. A moving overlay shrinks the attentional blink.
    Chua FK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Jan; 77(1):173-89. PubMed ID: 25245077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Why does a red snake in the grass capture your attention?
    Huang YM; Yeh YY
    Emotion; 2011 Apr; 11(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 21500891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. The influence of temporal selection on spatial selection and distractor interference: an attentional blink study.
    Jiang Y; Chun MM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Jun; 27(3):664-79. PubMed ID: 11424653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention.
    Olivers CN; Meeter M
    Psychol Rev; 2008 Oct; 115(4):836-63. PubMed ID: 18954206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Examining information processing biases in spider phobia using the rapid serial visual presentation paradigm.
    Cisler JM; Ries BJ; Widner RL
    J Anxiety Disord; 2007; 21(8):977-90. PubMed ID: 17275254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. The role of the collicular pathway in the salience-based progression of visual attention.
    Mizzi R; Michael GA
    Behav Brain Res; 2014 Aug; 270():330-8. PubMed ID: 24880095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks.
    Reardon KM; Kelly JG; Matthews N
    Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):691-701. PubMed ID: 19200437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Semantic and affective salience: the role of meaning and preference in attentional capture and disengagement.
    Biggs AT; Kreager RD; Gibson BS; Villano M; Crowell CR
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):531-41. PubMed ID: 22390289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.