These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17594797)

  • 101. Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink.
    Elliott JC; Giesbrecht B
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Nov; 72(8):2106-14. PubMed ID: 21097855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 102. Change is good: Inter-trial switching of target category improves attentional selection in time.
    Sdoia S; Ferlazzo F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():46-55. PubMed ID: 26722836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 103. Kanizsa-figure object completion gates selection in the attentional blink.
    Chen S; Nie QY; Müller HJ; Conci M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1741-1755. PubMed ID: 30501573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 104. Differentiating sexual preference in men: using dual task rapid serial visual presentation task.
    Zappalà A; Antfolk J; Bäckström A; Dombert B; Mokros A; Santtila P
    Scand J Psychol; 2013 Aug; 54(4):320-7. PubMed ID: 23683312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 105. A conceptual and methodological framework for measuring and modulating the attentional blink.
    MacLean MH; Arnell KM
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Aug; 74(6):1080-97. PubMed ID: 22821263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 106. Sources of the attentional blink during rapid serial visual presentation: perceptual interference and retrieval competition.
    Maki WS; Couture T; Frigen K; Lien D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Oct; 23(5):1393-411. PubMed ID: 9336959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 107. When do additional distractors reduce the attentional blink?
    Kawahara J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Aug; 35(4):1043-61. PubMed ID: 19653748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 108. The attentional blink: why does Lag-1 sparing occur when the dependent measure is accuracy, but Lag-1 deficit when it is RT?
    Lagroix HEP; Di Lollo V; Spalek TM
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1778-1797. PubMed ID: 29804134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 109. Is all sparing created equal? Comparing lag-1 sparing and extended sparing in temporal object perception.
    Visser TA; Ohan JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1527-41. PubMed ID: 21553987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 110. The duration of the attentional blink in natural scenes depends on stimulus category.
    Einhäuser W; Koch C; Makeig S
    Vision Res; 2007 Mar; 47(5):597-607. PubMed ID: 17275058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 111. Nontarget emotional stimuli must be highly conspicuous to modulate the attentional blink.
    Santacroce LA; Carlos BJ; Petro N; Tamber-Rosenau BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jul; 83(5):1971-1991. PubMed ID: 33754297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 112. Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness.
    Anderson AK
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 May; 134(2):258-81. PubMed ID: 15869349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 113. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 114. The attentional blink: increasing target salience provides no evidence for resource depletion. A commentary on Dux, Asplund, and Marois (2008).
    Olivers CN; Spalek TM; Kawahara J; Di Lollo V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Feb; 16(1):214-8; discussion 219-24. PubMed ID: 19145034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 115. Associative priming by targets and distractors during rapid serial visual presentation: does word meaning survive the attentional blink?
    Maki WS; Frigen K; Paulson K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1997 Aug; 23(4):1014-34. PubMed ID: 9269726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 116. The role of observer strategy in the single-target AB paradigm.
    Lagroix HE; Spalek TM; Di Lollo V
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Oct; 18(5):917-22. PubMed ID: 21748422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 117. Objects and events in the attentional blink.
    Sheppard DM; Duncan J; Shapiro KL; Hillstrom AP
    Psychol Sci; 2002 Sep; 13(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 12219806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 118. Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images.
    Wyble B; Folk C; Potter MC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):861-71. PubMed ID: 23163786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 119. More than a feeling: The emotional attentional blink relies on non-emotional "pop out," but is weak compared to the attentional blink.
    Santacroce LA; Swami AL; Tamber-Rosenau BJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 May; 85(4):1034-1053. PubMed ID: 36918514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 120. Modal-based attention modulates attentional blink.
    Wang A; Qian Q; Zhao C; Tang X; Zhang M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):372-382. PubMed ID: 34962629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.