These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17595072)

  • 1. Library fingerprints: a novel approach to the screening of virtual libraries.
    Klon AE; Diller DJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1354-65. PubMed ID: 17595072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Similarity searching and scaffold hopping in synthetically accessible combinatorial chemistry spaces.
    Boehm M; Wu TY; Claussen H; Lemmen C
    J Med Chem; 2008 Apr; 51(8):2468-80. PubMed ID: 18380426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Searching chemical space with the Bayesian Idea Generator.
    van Hoorn WP; Bell AS
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2211-20. PubMed ID: 19788263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian screening for active compounds in high-dimensional chemical spaces combining property descriptors and molecular fingerprints.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2008 Jan; 71(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 18069988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Similarity-based virtual screening with a bayesian inference network.
    Abdo A; Salim N
    ChemMedChem; 2009 Feb; 4(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 19072820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Similarity searching of chemical databases using atom environment descriptors (MOLPRINT 2D): evaluation of performance.
    Bender A; Mussa HY; Glen RC; Reiling S
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1708-18. PubMed ID: 15446830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A kinase-focused compound collection: compilation and screening strategy.
    Sun D; Chuaqui C; Deng Z; Bowes S; Chin D; Singh J; Cullen P; Hankins G; Lee WC; Donnelly J; Friedman J; Josiah S
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2006 Jun; 67(6):385-94. PubMed ID: 16882313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Natural product-likeness score and its application for prioritization of compound libraries.
    Ertl P; Roggo S; Schuffenhauer A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jan; 48(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 18034468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. CLEVER: pipeline for designing in silico chemical libraries.
    Song CM; Bernardo PH; Chai CL; Tong JC
    J Mol Graph Model; 2009 Jan; 27(5):578-83. PubMed ID: 18986817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the scaffold diversity of screening libraries.
    Krier M; Bret G; Rognan D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):512-24. PubMed ID: 16562979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A similarity-based data-fusion approach to the visual characterization and comparison of compound databases.
    Medina-Franco JL; Maggiora GM; Giulianotti MA; Pinilla C; Houghten RA
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Nov; 70(5):393-412. PubMed ID: 17927720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Data mining a small molecule drug screening representative subset from NIH PubChem.
    Xie XQ; Chen JZ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):465-75. PubMed ID: 18302356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reduced graph descriptor in virtual screening and data-driven clustering of high-throughput screening data.
    Harper G; Bravi GS; Pickett SD; Hussain J; Green DV
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(6):2145-56. PubMed ID: 15554685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A screening study of ChirBase molecular database to explore the expanded chiral pool derived from the application of chiral chromatography.
    Piras P; Roussel C
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Apr; 46(5):839-47. PubMed ID: 17942261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. One-bead-one-structure combinatorial libraries.
    Lebl M; Krchnák V; Sepetov NF; Seligmann B; Strop P; Felder S; Lam KS
    Biopolymers; 1995; 37(3):177-98. PubMed ID: 7718741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules?
    Ajay A; Walters WP; Murcko MA
    J Med Chem; 1998 Aug; 41(18):3314-24. PubMed ID: 9719583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The synergy between combinatorial chemistry and high-throughput screening.
    Diller DJ
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2008 May; 11(3):346-55. PubMed ID: 18428088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Introduction of a generally applicable method to estimate retrieval of active molecules for similarity searching using fingerprints.
    Vogt M; Bajorath J
    ChemMedChem; 2007 Sep; 2(9):1311-20. PubMed ID: 17562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mining high-throughput screening data of combinatorial libraries: development of a filter to distinguish hits from nonhits.
    Teckentrup A; Briem H; Gasteiger J
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(2):626-34. PubMed ID: 15032544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of chemical libraries for their druggability.
    Sirois S; Hatzakis G; Wei D; Du Q; Chou KC
    Comput Biol Chem; 2005 Feb; 29(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 15680586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.