These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
688 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17595182)
1. Economic evaluation of sevelamer in patients with end-stage renal disease. Manns B; Klarenbach S; Lee H; Culleton B; Shrive F; Tonelli M Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2007 Oct; 22(10):2867-78. PubMed ID: 17595182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A modeled economic evaluation of sevelamer for treatment of hyperphosphatemia associated with chronic kidney disease among patients on dialysis in the United Kingdom. Bernard L; Mendelssohn D; Dunn E; Hutchison C; Grima DT J Med Econ; 2013; 16(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 22857538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients: a Canadian payer perspective. Vegter S; Tolley K; Keith MS; Lok CE; Soroka SD; Morton AR Clin Ther; 2012 Jul; 34(7):1531-43. PubMed ID: 22742885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Economic evaluation of sevelamer for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients not on dialysis in the United Kingdom. Thompson M; Bartko-Winters S; Bernard L; Fenton A; Hutchison C; Di Iorio B J Med Econ; 2013; 16(6):744-55. PubMed ID: 23550810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Phosphorus (P) chelant in dialysis: efficacy and cost. Peritoneal dialysis solutions]. Montenegro J Nefrologia; 2008; 28 Suppl 5():53-7. PubMed ID: 18847421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incremental cost-utility of sevelamer relative to calcium carbonate for treatment of hyperphosphatemia among pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients. Nguyen HV; Bose S; Finkelstein E BMC Nephrol; 2016 Apr; 17(1):45. PubMed ID: 27121505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate versus sevelamer hydrochloride for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease: a US payer perspective. Park H; Rascati KL; Keith MS; Hodgkins P; Smyth M; Goldsmith D; Akehurst R Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1002-9. PubMed ID: 22152168 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An economic evaluation of sevelamer in patients new to dialysis. Taylor MJ; Elgazzar HA; Chaplin S; Goldsmith D; Molony DA Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 Feb; 24(2):601-8. PubMed ID: 18205996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Sevelamer and Lanthanum versus Calcium-Based Binders for Hyperphosphatemia of Chronic Kidney Disease. Habbous S; Przech S; Martin J; Garg AX; Sarma S Value Health; 2018 Mar; 21(3):318-325. PubMed ID: 29566839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolonged enoxaparin therapy to prevent venous thromboembolism after primary hip or knee replacement. A cost-utility analysis. Haentjens P; De Groote K; Annemans L Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2004 Oct; 124(8):507-17. PubMed ID: 15365714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cost-effectiveness of routine office-based identification and subsequent medical treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma in the United States. Rein DB; Wittenborn JS; Lee PP; Wirth KE; Sorensen SW; Hoerger TJ; Saaddine JB Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):823-32. PubMed ID: 19285730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Economic Evaluation of Sevelamer versus Calcium-based Binders in Treating Hyperphosphatemia among Patients with End-stage Renal Disease in China. Yang L; Chuen Tan S; Chen C; Wang X; Li X; Yang X Clin Ther; 2016 Nov; 38(11):2459-2467.e1. PubMed ID: 27751671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Phosphate binders, cardiovascular calcifications and mortality: do we need another survival study with sevelamer? Negri AL J Nephrol; 2010; 23(6):653-7. PubMed ID: 20349415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sevelamer is cost-saving vs. calcium carbonate in non-dialysis-dependent CKD patients in italy: a patient-level cost-effectiveness analysis of the INDEPENDENT study. Ruggeri M; Cipriani F; Bellasi A; Russo D; Di Iorio B Blood Purif; 2014; 37(4):316-24. PubMed ID: 25171148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Illustrating the impact of including future costs in economic evaluations: an application to end-stage renal disease care. Manns B; Meltzer D; Taub K; Donaldson C Health Econ; 2003 Nov; 12(11):949-58. PubMed ID: 14601157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A health economic analysis of screening and optimal treatment of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes and hypertension in the USA. Palmer AJ; Valentine WJ; Chen R; Mehin N; Gabriel S; Bregman B; Rodby RA Nephrol Dial Transplant; 2008 Apr; 23(4):1216-23. PubMed ID: 18359872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sevelamer treatment strategy in peritoneal dialysis patients: conventional dose does not make best use of resources. Chow KM; Szeto CC; Kwan BC; Leung CB; Li PK J Nephrol; 2007; 20(6):674-82. PubMed ID: 18046669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prevention and management of hyperphosphatemia with sevelamer in Canada: health and economic consequences. Huybrechts KF; Caro JJ; O'Brien JA Value Health; 2009; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 18647261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cost-utility analysis of cataract surgery in the second eye. Busbee BG; Brown MM; Brown GC; Sharma S Ophthalmology; 2003 Dec; 110(12):2310-7. PubMed ID: 14644712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cost-effectiveness of orlistat for the treatment of overweight and obese patients in Ireland. Lacey LA; Wolf A; O'shea D; Erny S; Ruof J Int J Obes (Lond); 2005 Aug; 29(8):975-82. PubMed ID: 15852050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]