BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1759766)

  • 1. Breast cancer data collection for surgical audit.
    Woods WG; Earlam RJ
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1991 Nov; 73(6):364-71; discussion 372. PubMed ID: 1759766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Relation of breast cancer tumour stage and the degree of registration in a population-based cancer registry].
    Katalinic A; Holzmann M; Kunze U
    Gesundheitswesen; 2003; 65(8-9):509-15. PubMed ID: 14505270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparability of colorectal cancer survival data in three European population-based registries.
    Monnet E; Faivre J; Raymond L; Garau I
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 1998 Apr; 7(2):127-34. PubMed ID: 9818774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Preventive health care, 1999 update: 3. Follow-up after breast cancer. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.
    Temple LK; Wang EE; McLeod RS
    CMAJ; 1999 Oct; 161(8):1001-8. PubMed ID: 10551200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Why did treatment rates for colorectal cancer in south east England fall between 1982 and 1988? The effect of case ascertainment and registration bias.
    Pollock AM; Benster R; Vickers N
    J Public Health Med; 1995 Dec; 17(4):419-28. PubMed ID: 8639341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
    Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
    Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Male breast cancer in the veterans affairs population: a comparative analysis.
    Nahleh ZA; Srikantiah R; Safa M; Jazieh AR; Muhleman A; Komrokji R
    Cancer; 2007 Apr; 109(8):1471-7. PubMed ID: 17342768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of statistics to assess the global burden of breast cancer.
    Parkin DM; Fernández LM
    Breast J; 2006; 12 Suppl 1():S70-80. PubMed ID: 16430400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effective treatment strategy in elderly breast cancer patients].
    Boér K
    Orv Hetil; 2005 Jan; 146(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 15715368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A population survival model for breast cancer.
    Stracci F; La Rosa F; Falsettini E; Ricci E; Aristei C; Bellezza G; Bolis GB; Fenocchio D; Gori S; Rulli A; Mastrandrea V
    Breast; 2005 Apr; 14(2):94-102. PubMed ID: 15767178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer survivors in the United States: geographic variability and time trends, 2005-2015.
    De Angelis R; Tavilla A; Verdecchia A; Scoppa S; Hachey M; Feuer EJ; Mariotto AB
    Cancer; 2009 May; 115(9):1954-66. PubMed ID: 19248047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stage II breast cancer is not simply a late stage I.
    Mueller CB
    Surgery; 1988 Oct; 104(4):631-8. PubMed ID: 3175861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Alterations of stage distribution for breast cancer since the implementation of national screening program in the Netherlands during 1989-1995].
    van Dijck JA; Hendriks JH; Holland R; Schouten LJ; Verbeek AL
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(23):1119-24. PubMed ID: 10876707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival after treatment for breast cancer in a geographically defined population.
    Tejler G; Norberg B; Dufmats M; Nordenskjöld B;
    Br J Surg; 2004 Oct; 91(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 15376206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast cancer outcomes following a national initiative in Ireland to restructure delivery of services for symptomatic disease.
    de Blacam C; Gray J; Boyle T; Kennedy MJ; Hollywood D; Butt J; Griffin M; Nicholson S; Dunne B; Wilson G; McDermott R; Murphy P; Short I; Rowley S; Connolly E; Reynolds JV
    Breast; 2008 Aug; 17(4):412-7. PubMed ID: 18486474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dissemination of adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States using estrogen receptor information: 1975-1999.
    Mariotto AB; Feuer EJ; Harlan LC; Abrams J
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):7-15. PubMed ID: 17032888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The influence of marital status on the stage at diagnosis, treatment, and survival of older women with breast cancer.
    Osborne C; Ostir GV; Du X; Peek MK; Goodwin JS
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2005 Sep; 93(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 16184457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trends in the treatment of breast cancer in Southeast England following the introduction of national guidelines.
    Tataru D; Robinson D; Møller H; Davies E
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2006 Sep; 28(3):215-7. PubMed ID: 16644905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.