475 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17597736)
41. Tracking the peer-review process.
Campion EW; Curfman GD; Drazen JM
N Engl J Med; 2000 Nov; 343(20):1485-6. PubMed ID: 11078775
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. Progress report and a farewell.
Noseworthy JH
Neurology; 2009 Jul; 73(1):8-10. PubMed ID: 19564580
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Publication in peer-reviewed medical journals.
Igić R
J BUON; 2006; 11(4):405-10. PubMed ID: 17309169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Great expectations.
Nat Neurosci; 2001 Dec; 4(12):1151. PubMed ID: 11723453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Peer review, unmasked.
Gura T
Nature; 2002 Mar; 416(6878):258-60. PubMed ID: 11907547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. "Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp, or what's a journal for? ".
Kurusz M
Perfusion; 2010 Mar; 25(2):55. PubMed ID: 20427411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Future of open access could be online and peer-reviewed.
Sandal M
Nature; 2008 Jul; 454(7201):158. PubMed ID: 18615058
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Scientific publishing-an evolving beast.
Chisti Y
Biotechnol Adv; 2003 Apr; 21(2):101-2. PubMed ID: 14499131
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Learning to review.
Freedman R
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Nov; 70(11):1599-600. PubMed ID: 20031100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The last bastion of collegiality: the peer-review process in the era of open access.
el-Azhary RA
Int J Dermatol; 2016 Mar; 55(3):247-8. PubMed ID: 26864493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Point and click.
Carroll-Johnson RM
Oncol Nurs Forum; 2003; 30(1):11. PubMed ID: 12515981
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The Neuroscience Peer Review Consortium.
Saper CB; Maunsell JH
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Feb; 29(3):435-6. PubMed ID: 19222555
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Streamlining the FastTrack.
Johnson CD
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2010 Apr; 92(3):181. PubMed ID: 20412667
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Setting logical priorities.
Mellman I
Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6832):1026. PubMed ID: 11323641
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Swift publication would reward good reviewers.
Koonin EV
Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6930):374. PubMed ID: 12660754
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Mixed response to NIH's web journal plan.
Butler D; Wadman M
Nature; 1999 May; 399(6731):8-9. PubMed ID: 10331377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Too much of a good thing….
Julian T
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2013 Oct; 17(4):371. PubMed ID: 24077310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Impact factors reward and promote excellence.
Lomnicki A
Nature; 2003 Jul; 424(6948):487. PubMed ID: 12891329
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Societies take united stand on journal access.
Giles J
Nature; 2004 Mar; 428(6981):356. PubMed ID: 15042053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Medscape General Medicine: the next steps in an ongoing experiment in medical publishing.
Lundberg GD; Silberg B; Myers C; Mariani S; Hung M; Zatz S; Holstein R
MedGenMed; 2002 Oct; 4(4):4. PubMed ID: 12817201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
