165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17598272)
1. [Patent law: avoiding pitfalls].
Kruspig RA
Chirurg; 2006 Nov; Suppl():354-5. PubMed ID: 17598272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Medical treatment inventions.
Soames C
Nat Rev Drug Discov; 2005 Dec; 4(12):951. PubMed ID: 16370074
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Patent law. New rules for German professors.
Kilger C; Bartenbach K
Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5596):1173-5. PubMed ID: 12424355
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Innovation and patents: in vitro diagnostics.
Carter S
Med Device Technol; 2003 May; 14(4):24. PubMed ID: 12774574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Patent protection in modern medical technology].
Bosch M
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():686-7. PubMed ID: 12465274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intellectual property. U.S. patent reform begins long journey through Congress.
Kintisch E
Science; 2005 Jun; 308(5729):1725-6. PubMed ID: 15961638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 364 May 2007. Patents, medicine, and the interests of patients.
Committees on Ethics and Genetics of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 109(5):1249-54. PubMed ID: 17470613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. International patent law-boon or bane of biotech?
Basu P
Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 15637604
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Enforcing pharmaceutical and biotech patent rights in China.
Zhang YP; Deng MM
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1235-40. PubMed ID: 18997760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intellectual property. U.S. Patent Office casts doubt on Wisconsin stem cell patents.
Holden C
Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):182. PubMed ID: 17431141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. DNA-based patents: an empirical analysis.
Mills AE; Tereskerz P
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Sep; 26(9):993-5. PubMed ID: 18779808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The case for patenting medical procedures.
Garris JJ
Am J Law Med; 1996; 22(1):85-108. PubMed ID: 8819597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patent law in dentistry: an overview.
Bijle MN
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(4):574-9. PubMed ID: 22124055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The new patent law may accelerate innovation in ophthalmology.
Higginbotham EJ; Upadhyay A; Egbuonu-Davis L
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):137-8. PubMed ID: 24310429
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Should patenting of surgical procedures and other medical techniques by physicians be banned?
Miller SA
Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 1997 May; (219):9-25. PubMed ID: 10173006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical issues in the patenting of medical procedures. American Medical Association, Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs.
Food Drug Law J; 1998; 53(2):341-51. PubMed ID: 10346690
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Devising a patent strategy to protect the IP of biologics in light of ambiguities, loopholes and pitfalls in the regulatory scheme.
Hsing BC; Palla SW
Pharm Pat Anal; 2013 Mar; 2(2):153-5. PubMed ID: 24237017
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Saving the patent law from itself: informal remarks concerning the systemic problems afflicting developed intellectual property regimes.
Reichman JH
Adv Genet; 2003; 50():289-303; discussion 507-10. PubMed ID: 14714697
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Scientific misconduct. Science retracts discredited paper; bitter patent dispute continues.
Normile D
Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5926):450-1. PubMed ID: 19390012
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Intellectual property and access to ART: unwise choice of terminology.
Stallman R
PLoS Med; 2006 Nov; 3(11):e509; author reply e510. PubMed ID: 17132062
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
