These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17598443)
1. [Forensic psychophysiological expertise with application of polygraph]. Gurgenidze EV; Komissarova IaV Sud Med Ekspert; 2007; 50(3):20-2. PubMed ID: 17598443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Methodological aspects of polygraph testing in the course of judicial proceedings]. Vvedenskiĭ GE; Tkachenko AA; Sekerazh TN Sud Med Ekspert; 2009; 52(3):36-9. PubMed ID: 19569540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review. Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Polygraph testing for deception in Australia: effective aid to crime investigation and adjudication? McMahon M J Law Med; 2003 Aug; 11(1):24-47. PubMed ID: 14526725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Post-conviction sex offender polygraph examination: client-reported perceptions of utility and accuracy. Kokish R; Levenson JS; Blasingame GD Sex Abuse; 2005 Apr; 17(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 15974426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The polygraph and forensic psychiatry. Grubin D J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(4):446-51. PubMed ID: 21156902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The current role of post-conviction sex offender polygraph testing in sex offender treatment. Kokish R J Child Sex Abus; 2003; 12(3-4):175-94. PubMed ID: 15308451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: scientific, ethical, and legal issues. Meegan DV Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):9-20. PubMed ID: 18236327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New measures improve the accuracy of the directed-lie test when detecting deception using a mock crime. Bell BG; Kircher JC; Bernhardt PC Physiol Behav; 2008 Jun; 94(3):331-40. PubMed ID: 18343464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not devoid of forensic potential, but.. Allen JJ Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):27-8; discussion W1-4. PubMed ID: 18236331 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Information gain of psychophysiological detection of deception in forensic and screening settings. Honts CR; Schweinle W Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):161-72. PubMed ID: 19609667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The regulations for the forensic medical expertise of the severity of harm to health. Appendix 2 to the order of the Ministry of Public Health of the Russian Federation of 10 December 1996 No. 407]. Sud Med Ekspert; 1997; 40(2):48-53. PubMed ID: 9254457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The forensic application of "brain fingerprinting:" why scientists should encourage the use of P300 memory detection methods. Iacono WG Am J Bioeth; 2008 Jan; 8(1):30-2; discussion W1-4. PubMed ID: 18236333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Commentary on: Horvath F, Palmatier JJ. Critique of Horvath-Palmatier Laboratory study on effectiveness of exclusive v. non-exclusive control questions in polygraph examination. J Forensic Sci 2008;53(4):889-99. Matte JA J Forensic Sci; 2011 Nov; 56(6):1664-7; author reply 1668-70. PubMed ID: 22040043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The rise and fall of forensic hypnosis in criminal investigation. Newman AW; Thompson JW J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(1):75-84. PubMed ID: 11302391 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Legal approaches to the forensic psychiatric expertise of persons who have committed socially dangerous actions in a state of intoxication with alcohol and other psychoactive substances]. Igonin AL; Klimenko TV; Gerasimova SM; Kosheleva TS Sud Med Ekspert; 1997; 40(3):35-8. PubMed ID: 9304254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuroscience, lie-detection, and the law: contrary to the prevailing view, the suitability of brain-based lie-detection for courtroom or forensic use should be determined according to legal and not scientific standards. Schauer F Trends Cogn Sci; 2010 Mar; 14(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 20060772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. New developments in preventive detention in Germany. Steinböck HR Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 22(5):488-91. PubMed ID: 19633558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of polygraph data obtained from individuals involved in mock crimes and actual criminal investigations. Pollina DA; Dollins AB; Senter SM; Krapohl DJ; Ryan AH J Appl Psychol; 2004 Dec; 89(6):1099-105. PubMed ID: 15584845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy. Pozzulo JD; Crescini C; Panton T Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 18790535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]