These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17598753)

  • 1. Signal reliability compromised by genotype-by-environment interaction and potential mechanisms for its preservation.
    Mills SC; Alatalo RV; Koskela E; Mappes J; Mappes T; Oksanen TA
    Evolution; 2007 Jul; 61(7):1748-57. PubMed ID: 17598753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of genotype, age, and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behavior, and attractiveness.
    Miller LK; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2414-25. PubMed ID: 16396182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sexual selection for male dominance reduces opportunities for female mate choice in the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus).
    Reichard M; Bryja J; Ondracková M; Dávidová M; Kaniewska P; Smith C
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Apr; 14(5):1533-42. PubMed ID: 15813791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization.
    Danielson-François AM; Kelly JK; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):532-42. PubMed ID: 16599929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testosterone-mediated effects on fitness-related phenotypic traits and fitness.
    Mills SC; Grapputo A; Jokinen I; Koskela E; Mappes T; Oksanen TA; Poikonen T
    Am Nat; 2009 Apr; 173(4):475-87. PubMed ID: 19236274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic and environmental effects on secondary sex traits in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).
    Hughes KA; Rodd FH; Reznick DN
    J Evol Biol; 2005 Jan; 18(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 15669959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The importance of female choice, male-male competition, and signal transmission as causes of selection on male mating signals.
    Sullivan-Beckers L; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2010 Nov; 64(11):3158-71. PubMed ID: 20624180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grain of environment explains variation in the strength of genotype × environment interaction.
    Rodríguez RL
    J Evol Biol; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1897-901. PubMed ID: 22805149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Heritable variation in the timing of spermatophore removal, a mechanism of post-copulatory female choice in crickets.
    Mautz BS; Sakaluk SK
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Sep; 21(5):1366-70. PubMed ID: 18544069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions.
    Rodríguez RL; Hallett AC; Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):434-42. PubMed ID: 23252651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intra- and intersexual trade-offs between testosterone and immune system: Implications for sexual and sexually antagonistic selection.
    Schroderus E; Jokinen I; Koivula M; Koskela E; Mappes T; Mills SC; Oksanen TA; Poikonen T
    Am Nat; 2010 Oct; 176(4):E90-7. PubMed ID: 20712516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Heritability of male attractiveness persists despite evidence for unreliable sexual signals in Drosophila simulans.
    Ingleby FC; Hunt J; Hosken DJ
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):311-24. PubMed ID: 23206188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Host shifts and the beginning of signal divergence.
    Rodríguez RL; Sullivan LM; Snyder RL; Cocroft RB
    Evolution; 2008 Jan; 62(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 18005157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hemiclonal analysis reveals significant genetic, environmental and genotype x environment effects on sperm size in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Morrow EH; Leijon A; Meerupati A
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1692-702. PubMed ID: 18691240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genotype by environment interactions in viability and developmental time in populations of cactophilic Drosophila.
    Fanara JJ; Folguera G; Iriarte PF; Mensch J; Hasson E
    J Evol Biol; 2006 May; 19(3):900-8. PubMed ID: 16674586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17619173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative frequency-dependent selection of sexually antagonistic alleles in Myodes glareolus.
    Mokkonen M; Kokko H; Koskela E; Lehtonen J; Mappes T; Martiskainen H; Mills SC
    Science; 2011 Nov; 334(6058):972-4. PubMed ID: 22096197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genotype-by-environment interactions for cuticular hydrocarbon expression in Drosophila simulans.
    Ingleby FC; Hosken DJ; Flowers K; Hawkes MF; Lane SM; Rapkin J; Dworkin I; Hunt J
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):94-107. PubMed ID: 23163514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): toward a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Zhou Y; Kuster HK; Pettis JS; Danka RG; Gleason JM; Greenfield MD
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1317-34. PubMed ID: 18346222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.