These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. A technicians' perspective: tips and techniques for using disposable tab electrocardiogram electrodes; an easy to remember method for preventing electrocardiogram lead interchange. Coleman ME J Electrocardiol; 2006 Oct; 39(4):355-7. PubMed ID: 16697398 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Control of electrocardiogram acquisition errors: a brief perspective. Rautaharju PM J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):395-7. PubMed ID: 18721646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A flatline electrocardiogram in lead II is a marker for right arm/right leg electrode switch. Hoffman I J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jul; 40(3):226-7. PubMed ID: 16916521 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The "low-tech" made simpler. Trigano AJ J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):393-4. PubMed ID: 18572181 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic accuracy of a 15-lead hybrid computer-aided electrocardiographic system. Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Reich M; Chiang R; Morris K Eur J Cardiol; 1973 Sep; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 4618198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Recording electrocardiograms using 3-limb lead cables instead of the standard 4: a modification to minimize incorrect electrode placements. Soliman EZ J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):391-2. PubMed ID: 18440548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Right hypertrophy in the electrocardiogram]. So CS Med Klin; 1971 May; 66(22):801-5. PubMed ID: 4253570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Electromagnetic interference produced by a hearing aid device on electrocardiogram recording. Baranchuk AM; Kang J; Shaw C; Witjes R J Electrocardiol; 2008; 41(5):398-400. PubMed ID: 18353350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An unusual electrocardiogram artifact in a patient with near syncope. Aslanger E J Electrocardiol; 2010; 43(6):686-8. PubMed ID: 20553822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An unusual electrocardiogram artifact: what is its source? Reddy NK; Merla R; Pehlivanov ND; Pasricha PJ; Ware DL; Birnbaum Y J Electrocardiol; 2005 Oct; 38(4):337-9. PubMed ID: 16216608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of computerized interpretation of an electrocardiogram reading. Martínez-Losas P; Higueras J; Gómez-Polo JC; Brabyn P; Ferrer JM; Cañadas V; Villacastín JP Am J Emerg Med; 2016 Oct; 34(10):2031-2032. PubMed ID: 27489186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Electrocardiographic artifacts due to the incorrect use of filters]. Slavich G; Di Benedetto L; Sbrojavacca R; Bocin E Ital Heart J Suppl; 2003 Jun; 4(6):514-7. PubMed ID: 19400058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Electrocardiogram artifact. Won S; Suenishi N; Singh D J Electrocardiol; 2013; 46(4):375-6. PubMed ID: 23523145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Diagnostic significance of changes in the ST-T complex of the electrocardiogram (review of the literature)]. Ostropolets SS; Zolotova LI Vrach Delo; 1984 Dec; (12):71-5. PubMed ID: 6523831 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]