BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

647 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17599694)

  • 1. Extubation force: tape versus endotracheal tube holders.
    Carlson J; Mayrose J; Krause R; Jehle D
    Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Dec; 50(6):686-91. PubMed ID: 17599694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extubation force: a comparison of adhesive tape, non-adhesive tape and a commercial endotracheal tube holder.
    Owen R; Castle N; Hann H; Reeves D; Naidoo R; Naidoo S
    Resuscitation; 2009 Nov; 80(11):1296-300. PubMed ID: 19726121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Endotracheal tube extubation force: adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube holder.
    Shimizu T; Mizutani T; Yamashita S; Hagiya K; Tanaka M
    Respir Care; 2011 Nov; 56(11):1825-9. PubMed ID: 21605477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.
    Buckley JC; Brown AP; Shin JS; Rogers KM; Hoftman NN
    Anesth Analg; 2016 May; 122(5):1439-43. PubMed ID: 26983051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Comparative study of oral tracheal tube extubation force in a baby manikin model: taping methods and tube diameters].
    Kurokawa Y; Shimizu T; Yamashita S; Tanaka M; Mizutani T
    Masui; 2011 Aug; 60(8):982-4. PubMed ID: 21861432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Endotracheal tube fixation methods for optimal stability: a comparison of adhesive tape, suture, and tape-suture fixation.
    Farbod F; Tuli P; Robertson BF; Jackson IT
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 21(4):1250-1. PubMed ID: 20613600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of four endotracheal tube holders.
    Kaplow R; Bookbinder M
    Heart Lung; 1994; 23(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 8150646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of tape-tying versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults.
    Murdoch E; Holdgate A
    Anaesth Intensive Care; 2007 Oct; 35(5):730-5. PubMed ID: 17933160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Shifts in endotracheal tube position due to chest compressions: a simulation comparison by fixation method.
    Komasawa N; Fujiwara S; Miyazaki S; Ohchi F; Minami T
    J Emerg Med; 2015 Feb; 48(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 25440458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of tube-taping versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults undergoing surgery in prone position.
    Santhosh MC; Torgal SV; Pai RB; Roopa S; Santoshi VB; Rao RP
    Acta Anaesthesiol Belg; 2013; 64(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 24191528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of commercial and noncommercial endotracheal tube-securing devices.
    Fisher DF; Chenelle CT; Marchese AD; Kratohvil JP; Kacmarek RM
    Respir Care; 2014 Sep; 59(9):1315-23. PubMed ID: 24368866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of techniques for securing the endotracheal tube while wearing chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear protection: a manikin study.
    Castle N; Owen R; Clark S; Hann M; Reeces D; Gurney I
    Prehosp Disaster Med; 2010; 25(6):589-94. PubMed ID: 21181696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Cuff pressure in endotracheal intubation: should it be routinely measured?].
    Curiel García JA; Guerrero-Romero F; Rodríguez-Morán M
    Gac Med Mex; 2001; 137(2):179-82. PubMed ID: 11381810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of two methods used to stabilize oral endotracheal tubes.
    Tasota FJ; Hoffman LA; Zullo TG; Jamison G
    Heart Lung; 1987 Mar; 16(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 3643914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An assessment of a tracheal tube introducer as an endotracheal tube placement confirmation device.
    Bair AE; Laurin EG; Schmitt BJ
    Am J Emerg Med; 2005 Oct; 23(6):754-8. PubMed ID: 16182983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial.
    Landsperger JS; Byram JM; Lloyd BD; Rice TW;
    Crit Care; 2019 May; 23(1):161. PubMed ID: 31064406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Continuous airway access for the difficult extubation: the efficacy of the airway exchange catheter.
    Mort TC
    Anesth Analg; 2007 Nov; 105(5):1357-62, table of contents. PubMed ID: 17959966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Pediatric airway management : cuffed endotracheal tube and other devices for tracheal intubation].
    Kagawa T
    Masui; 2007 May; 56(5):534-41. PubMed ID: 17515092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Characterizing the Structural Integrity of Endotracheal Tube Taping Techniques: A Simulation Study.
    Matchett G; Yang JH; Sripathi NR; Simpkins L; Ruikar K; Minhajuddin A; Whitten CW
    Anesth Analg; 2020 Aug; 131(2):544-554. PubMed ID: 32520490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of appropriate procedures for inflation of endotracheal tube cuff in intubated patients.
    Sridermma S; Limtangturakool S; Wongsurakiat P; Thamlikitkul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Nov; 90 Suppl 2():74-8. PubMed ID: 19238648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 33.