These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17599796)
1. Interfering with remembering and knowing: effects of divided attention at retrieval. Skinner EI; Fernandes MA Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17599796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural correlates of auditory recognition under full and divided attention in younger and older adults. Fernandes MA; Pacurar A; Moscovitch M; Grady C Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2452-64. PubMed ID: 16769093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention. Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M; Ziegler M; Grady C Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1115-27. PubMed ID: 15817169 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study. Uncapher MR; Rugg MD J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of frontal and temporal lobe function to memory interference from divided attention at retrieval. Fernandes MA; Davidson PS; Glisky EL; Moscovitch M Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):514-25. PubMed ID: 15291729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments. McCabe DP; Geraci LD Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 19344688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Illusory recollection in older adults and younger adults under divided attention. Skinner EI; Fernandes MA Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 19290753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of aging in recollective experience: the processing speed and executive functioning hypothesis. Bugaiska A; Clarys D; Jarry C; Taconnat L; Tapia G; Vanneste S; Isingrini M Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):797-808. PubMed ID: 17251040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval. Voss JL; Paller KA Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. Castel AD; Craik FI Psychol Aging; 2003 Dec; 18(4):873-85. PubMed ID: 14692872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related ERP differences at retrieval persist despite age-invariant performance and left-frontal negativity during encoding. Nessler D; Johnson R; Bersick M; Friedman D Neurosci Lett; 2008 Feb; 432(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 18226452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Process-specific interference effects during recognition of spatial patterns and words. Fernandes M; Guild E Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 19271812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does repetition engender the same retrieval processes in young and older adults? Nessler D; Friedman D; Johnson R; Bersick M Neuroreport; 2007 Nov; 18(17):1837-40. PubMed ID: 18090322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults. Kray J Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of age and divided attention on memory components derived for the category exemplar generation task. Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Woo E Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 May; 14(3):274-300. PubMed ID: 17453561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age differences in susceptibility to memory interference during recall of categorizable but not unrelated word lists. Fernandes MA; Grady C Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):297-322. PubMed ID: 18726747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures. Van Hooff JC; Whitaker TA; Ford RM Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 19556048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory. Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-related differences in brain activity during verbal recency memory. Rajah MN; McIntosh AR Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 1199():111-25. PubMed ID: 18282558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]