377 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17599796)
1. Interfering with remembering and knowing: effects of divided attention at retrieval.
Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17599796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Neural correlates of auditory recognition under full and divided attention in younger and older adults.
Fernandes MA; Pacurar A; Moscovitch M; Grady C
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(12):2452-64. PubMed ID: 16769093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain regions associated with successful and unsuccessful retrieval of verbal episodic memory as revealed by divided attention.
Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M; Ziegler M; Grady C
Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(8):1115-27. PubMed ID: 15817169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractionation of the component processes underlying successful episodic encoding: a combined fMRI and divided-attention study.
Uncapher MR; Rugg MD
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Feb; 20(2):240-54. PubMed ID: 18275332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Contribution of frontal and temporal lobe function to memory interference from divided attention at retrieval.
Fernandes MA; Davidson PS; Glisky EL; Moscovitch M
Neuropsychology; 2004 Jul; 18(3):514-25. PubMed ID: 15291729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember-know judgments.
McCabe DP; Geraci LD
Conscious Cogn; 2009 Jun; 18(2):401-13. PubMed ID: 19344688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Illusory recollection in older adults and younger adults under divided attention.
Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
Psychol Aging; 2009 Mar; 24(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 19290753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effect of aging in recollective experience: the processing speed and executive functioning hypothesis.
Bugaiska A; Clarys D; Jarry C; Taconnat L; Tapia G; Vanneste S; Isingrini M
Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):797-808. PubMed ID: 17251040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Remembering and knowing: electrophysiological distinctions at encoding but not retrieval.
Voss JL; Paller KA
Neuroimage; 2009 May; 46(1):280-9. PubMed ID: 19457375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information.
Castel AD; Craik FI
Psychol Aging; 2003 Dec; 18(4):873-85. PubMed ID: 14692872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Age-related ERP differences at retrieval persist despite age-invariant performance and left-frontal negativity during encoding.
Nessler D; Johnson R; Bersick M; Friedman D
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Feb; 432(2):151-6. PubMed ID: 18226452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Process-specific interference effects during recognition of spatial patterns and words.
Fernandes M; Guild E
Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):24-32. PubMed ID: 19271812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does repetition engender the same retrieval processes in young and older adults?
Nessler D; Friedman D; Johnson R; Bersick M
Neuroreport; 2007 Nov; 18(17):1837-40. PubMed ID: 18090322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.
Wais PE; Mickes L; Wixted JT
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 18004949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Task-set switching under cue-based versus memory-based switching conditions in younger and older adults.
Kray J
Brain Res; 2006 Aug; 1105(1):83-92. PubMed ID: 16387284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of age and divided attention on memory components derived for the category exemplar generation task.
Schmitter-Edgecombe M; Woo E
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2007 May; 14(3):274-300. PubMed ID: 17453561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Age differences in susceptibility to memory interference during recall of categorizable but not unrelated word lists.
Fernandes MA; Grady C
Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(4):297-322. PubMed ID: 18726747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Directed forgetting in direct and indirect tests of memory: seeking evidence of retrieval inhibition using electrophysiological measures.
Van Hooff JC; Whitaker TA; Ford RM
Brain Cogn; 2009 Nov; 71(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 19556048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-related differences in brain activity during verbal recency memory.
Rajah MN; McIntosh AR
Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 1199():111-25. PubMed ID: 18282558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
