These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17600097)

  • 41. A cognitive evaluation of four online search engines for answering definitional questions posed by physicians.
    Yu H; Kaufman D
    Pac Symp Biocomput; 2007; ():328-39. PubMed ID: 17990503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. What factors are associated with the integration of evidence retrieval technology into routine general practice settings?
    Magrabi F; Westbrook JI; Coiera EW
    Int J Med Inform; 2007 Oct; 76(10):701-9. PubMed ID: 16893677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Using the World Wide Web to answer clinical questions: how efficient are different methods of information retrieval?
    Graber MA; Bergus GR; York C
    J Fam Pract; 1999 Jul; 48(7):520-4. PubMed ID: 10428249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Randomized trial for answers to clinical questions: evaluating a pre-appraised versus a MEDLINE search protocol.
    Patel MR; Schardt CM; Sanders LL; Keitz SA
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2006 Oct; 94(4):382-7. PubMed ID: 17082828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Is bias in the eye of the beholder? A vignette study to assess recognition of cognitive biases in clinical case workups.
    Zwaan L; Monteiro S; Sherbino J; Ilgen J; Howey B; Norman G
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2017 Feb; 26(2):104-110. PubMed ID: 26825476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Patient-care questions that physicians are unable to answer.
    Ely JW; Osheroff JA; Maviglia SM; Rosenbaum ME
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(4):407-14. PubMed ID: 17460122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The moderating role of need for cognition on excessive searching bias: a case of finding romantic partners online.
    Chiou WB; Yang ML
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 154():120-2. PubMed ID: 20543282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. ClinicalAccess: a clinical decision support tool.
    Crowell K; Vardell E
    Med Ref Serv Q; 2015; 34(2):215-23. PubMed ID: 25927513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Biases in medication prescribing: the case of second-generation antipsychotics.
    Makhinson M
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2010 Jan; 16(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 20098227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of XML markup on retrieval of clinical documents.
    Arnott Smith C
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():614-8. PubMed ID: 14728246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A navigation flow map method of representing students' searching behaviors and strategies on the web, with relation to searching outcomes.
    Lin CC; Tsai CC
    Cyberpsychol Behav; 2007 Oct; 10(5):689-95. PubMed ID: 17927537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Efficiently finding and using evidence to guide clinical practice and improve care.
    Akbashev MY; Pittman JR; Dressler DD
    JAAPA; 2017 Nov; 30(11):31-38. PubMed ID: 29064936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Lucky guess or knowledge: a cross-sectional study using the Bland and Altman analysis to compare confidence-based testing of pharmacological knowledge in 3rd and 5th year medical students.
    Kampmeyer D; Matthes J; Herzig S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 May; 20(2):431-40. PubMed ID: 25103688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Information seeking and retrieval skills of nurses: Nurses readiness for evidence based practice in hospitals of a medical university in Iran.
    Farokhzadian J; Khajouei R; Ahmadian L
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Aug; 84(8):570-7. PubMed ID: 25936728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Searching for cancer information on the internet: analyzing natural language search queries.
    Bader JL; Theofanos MF
    J Med Internet Res; 2003 Dec; 5(4):e31. PubMed ID: 14713659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Measures of self-efficacy among doctors in conducting an online search for clinical decision making.
    Naeem SB; Bhatti R
    Health Info Libr J; 2020 Jun; 37(2):128-142. PubMed ID: 31984631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. How breast cancer patients want to search for and retrieve information from stories of other patients on the internet: an online randomized controlled experiment.
    Overberg R; Otten W; de Man A; Toussaint P; Westenbrink J; Zwetsloot-Schonk B
    J Med Internet Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):e7. PubMed ID: 20215101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Online on-the-spot searching increases use of evidence during consultations in family practice.
    Van Duppen D; Aertgeerts B; Hannes K; Neirinckx J; Seuntjens L; Goossens F; Van Linden A
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Sep; 68(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 17540531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Searching the evidence: the clinically-effective nutritionist.
    Moore H; Summerbell C
    Proc Nutr Soc; 2003 Nov; 62(4):773-6. PubMed ID: 15018474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. MEDLINE as a source of just-in-time answers to clinical questions.
    Demner-Fushman D; Hauser SE; Humphrey SM; Ford GM; Jacobs JL; Thoma GR
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():190-4. PubMed ID: 17238329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.