These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17600571)

  • 1. Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter.
    Butler JJ; Dietrich P; Wittig V; Christy T
    Ground Water; 2007; 45(4):409-19. PubMed ID: 17600571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A rapid method for hydraulic profiling in unconsolidated formations.
    Dietrich P; Butler JJ; Faiss K
    Ground Water; 2008; 46(2):323-8. PubMed ID: 18307433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. "Characterizing hydraulic conductivity with the direct-push permeameter," by James J. Butler Jr., Peter Dietrich, Volker Wittig, and Tom Christy, July–August 2007, v. 45, no. 4:409-419.
    Chapuis RP; Chenaf D
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):792-3; discussion 793-5. PubMed ID: 20678144
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Design and application of a direct-push vadose zone gravel permeameter.
    Miller RB; Heeren DM; Fox GA; Storm DE; Halihan T
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(6):920-5. PubMed ID: 21306360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of combined direct-push methods used for aquifer model generation.
    Köber R; Hornbruch G; Leven C; Tischer L; Grossmann J; Dietrich P; Weiss H; Dahmke A
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(4):536-46. PubMed ID: 19341375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inherent limitations of hydraulic tomography.
    Bohling GC; Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(6):809-24. PubMed ID: 20860689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of vertical variations in hydraulic conductivity in unconsolidated sediments.
    Dietze M; Dietrich P
    Ground Water; 2012; 50(3):450-6. PubMed ID: 21883188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydraulic tests with direct-push equipment.
    Butler JJ; Healey JM; McCall GW; Garnett EJ; Loheide SP
    Ground Water; 2002; 40(1):25-36. PubMed ID: 11798043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determining hydraulic conductivity using pumping data from low-flow sampling.
    Robbins GA; Aragon-Jose AT; Romero A
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(2):271-86. PubMed ID: 19040434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing lakebed hydraulic conductivity and seepage flux by potentiomanometer.
    Ong JB; Zlotnik VA
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(2):270-4. PubMed ID: 20497483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. NMR Logging to Estimate Hydraulic Conductivity in Unconsolidated Aquifers.
    Knight R; Walsh DO; Butler JJ; Grunewald E; Liu G; Parsekian AD; Reboulet EC; Knobbe S; Barrows M
    Ground Water; 2016 Jan; 54(1):104-14. PubMed ID: 25810149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A forward modeling approach for interpreting impeller flow logs.
    Parker AH; West LJ; Odling NE; Bown RT
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(1):79-91. PubMed ID: 19650812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Simple Field Method for Assessing Near-Surface Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity.
    Lewis J
    Ground Water; 2016 Sep; 54(5):740-744. PubMed ID: 26867037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characterization of subsoil heterogeneity, estimation of grain size distribution and hydraulic conductivity at the Krauthausen test site using Cone Penetration Test.
    Tillmann A; Englert A; Nyari Z; Fejes I; Vanderborght J; Vereecken H
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Jan; 95(1-2):57-75. PubMed ID: 17920726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Permeability profiles in granular aquifers using flowmeters in direct-push wells.
    Paradis D; Lefebvre R; Morin RH; Gloaguen E
    Ground Water; 2011; 49(4):534-47. PubMed ID: 20880040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biased monitoring of fresh water-salt water mixing zone in coastal aquifers.
    Shalev E; Lazar A; Wollman S; Kington S; Yechieli Y; Gvirtzman H
    Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 18823401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating biozone hydraulic conductivity in wastewater soil-infiltration systems using inverse numerical modeling.
    Bumgarner JR; McCray JE
    Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(11):2349-60. PubMed ID: 17449084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Miniaturization of the flowing fluid electric conductivity logging technique.
    Su GW; Quinn NW; Cook PJ; Shipp W
    Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):754-7. PubMed ID: 16961498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct-push hydrostratigraphic profiling: coupling electrical logging and slug tests.
    Sellwood SM; Healey JM; Birk S; Butler JJ
    Ground Water; 2005; 43(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 15726921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of tandem circulation wells to measure hydraulic conductivity without groundwater extraction.
    Goltz MN; Huang J; Close ME; Flintoft MJ; Pang L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):127-36. PubMed ID: 18674844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.