These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. An assessment of aquifer storage recovery using ground water flow models. Lowry CS; Anderson MP Ground Water; 2006; 44(5):661-7. PubMed ID: 16961487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Heat as a ground water tracer. Anderson MP Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):951-68. PubMed ID: 16324018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modeling of flow and contaminant transport in coupled stream-aquifer systems. Hussein M; Schwartz FW J Contam Hydrol; 2003 Aug; 65(1-2):41-64. PubMed ID: 12855200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patterns of water, heat, and solute flux through streambeds around small dams. Fanelli RM; Lautz LK Ground Water; 2008; 46(5):671-87. PubMed ID: 18522652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Probability density function of non-reactive solute concentration in heterogeneous porous formations. Bellin A; Tonina D J Contam Hydrol; 2007 Oct; 94(1-2):109-25. PubMed ID: 17628204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling ground water flow in alluvial mountainous catchments on a watershed scale. Wolf J; Barthel R; Braun J Ground Water; 2008; 46(5):695-705. PubMed ID: 18459959 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Key features of artificial aquifers for use in modeling contaminant transport. Close M; Bright J; Wang F; Pang L; Manning M Ground Water; 2008; 46(6):814-28. PubMed ID: 18657117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fuzzy-stochastic characterization of site uncertainty and variability in groundwater flow and contaminant transport through a heterogeneous aquifer. Zhang K; Li H; Achari G J Contam Hydrol; 2009 Apr; 106(1-2):73-82. PubMed ID: 19217686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calculating ground water transit time of horizontal flow through leaky aquifers. Braunsfurth AC; Schneider W Ground Water; 2008; 46(1):160-3. PubMed ID: 18181875 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Uncertainty estimation of pathlines in ground water models. Stauffer F Ground Water; 2005; 43(6):843-9. PubMed ID: 16324006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using semivariogram parameter uncertainty in hydrogeological applications. Pardo-Igúzquiza E; Chica-Olmo M; Garcia-Soldado MJ; Luque-Espinar JA Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 18793202 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revisiting a classification scheme for U.S.-Mexico alluvial basin-fill aquifers. Hibbs BJ; Darling BK Ground Water; 2005; 43(5):750-63. PubMed ID: 16149972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analytical solution to transport in three-dimensional heterogeneous well capture zones. Indelman P; Lessoff SC; Dagan G J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Sep; 87(1-2):1-21. PubMed ID: 16844264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of karst aquifer spring flows with a gray system decomposition model. Hao Y; Yeh TC; Wang Y; Zhao Y Ground Water; 2007; 45(1):46-52. PubMed ID: 17257338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biased monitoring of fresh water-salt water mixing zone in coastal aquifers. Shalev E; Lazar A; Wollman S; Kington S; Yechieli Y; Gvirtzman H Ground Water; 2009; 47(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 18823401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Locating the zone of saline intrusion in a coastal karst aquifer using springflow data. Arfib B; de Marsily G; Ganoulis J Ground Water; 2007; 45(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 17257336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]