These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17600612)

  • 1. A novel empirical free energy function that explains and predicts protein-protein binding affinities.
    Audie J; Scarlata S
    Biophys Chem; 2007 Sep; 129(2-3):198-211. PubMed ID: 17600612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and validation of an empirical free energy function for calculating protein-protein binding free energy surfaces.
    Audie J
    Biophys Chem; 2009 Feb; 139(2-3):84-91. PubMed ID: 19041170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An all atom energy based computational protocol for predicting binding affinities of protein-ligand complexes.
    Jain T; Jayaram B
    FEBS Lett; 2005 Dec; 579(29):6659-66. PubMed ID: 16307743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhu Q; Zhou Y
    J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2325-35. PubMed ID: 15801826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I; Martin YC
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Large-scale validation of a quantum mechanics based scoring function: predicting the binding affinity and the binding mode of a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes.
    Raha K; Merz KM
    J Med Chem; 2005 Jul; 48(14):4558-75. PubMed ID: 15999994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Solvated interaction energy (SIE) for scoring protein-ligand binding affinities. 1. Exploring the parameter space.
    Naïm M; Bhat S; Rankin KN; Dennis S; Chowdhury SF; Siddiqi I; Drabik P; Sulea T; Bayly CI; Jakalian A; Purisima EO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):122-33. PubMed ID: 17238257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Scoring a diverse set of high-quality docked conformations: a metascore based on electrostatic and desolvation interactions.
    Camacho CJ; Ma H; Champ PC
    Proteins; 2006 Jun; 63(4):868-77. PubMed ID: 16506242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of MMPBSA and XSCORE to compute binding free energy in XIAP-peptide complexes.
    Obiol-Pardo C; Rubio-Martinez J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):134-42. PubMed ID: 17238258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation.
    Huey R; Morris GM; Olson AJ; Goodsell DS
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Apr; 28(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 17274016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities.
    Krammer A; Kirchhoff PD; Jiang X; Venkatachalam CM; Waldman M
    J Mol Graph Model; 2005 Apr; 23(5):395-407. PubMed ID: 15781182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Specific empirical free energy function for automated docking of carbohydrates to proteins.
    Laederach A; Reilly PJ
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Nov; 24(14):1748-57. PubMed ID: 12964193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physics-based scoring of protein-ligand interactions: explicit polarizability, quantum mechanics and free energies.
    Bryce RA
    Future Med Chem; 2011 Apr; 3(6):683-98. PubMed ID: 21554075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Physics-based methods for studying protein-ligand interactions.
    Huang N; Jacobson MP
    Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2007 May; 10(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 17554859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distance dependent scoring function for describing protein-ligand intermolecular interactions.
    Artemenko N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Mar; 48(3):569-74. PubMed ID: 18290639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Novel, customizable scoring functions, parameterized using N-PLS, for structure-based drug discovery.
    Catana C; Stouten PF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17238252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incorporating receptor flexibility in the molecular design of protein interfaces.
    Li L; Liang S; Pilcher MM; Meroueh SO
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):575-86. PubMed ID: 19643976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new implicit solvent model for protein-ligand docking.
    Morreale A; Gil-Redondo R; Ortiz AR
    Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):606-16. PubMed ID: 17330937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.