These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17600612)

  • 21. Novel, customizable scoring functions, parameterized using N-PLS, for structure-based drug discovery.
    Catana C; Stouten PF
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):85-91. PubMed ID: 17238252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incorporating receptor flexibility in the molecular design of protein interfaces.
    Li L; Liang S; Pilcher MM; Meroueh SO
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):575-86. PubMed ID: 19643976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A new implicit solvent model for protein-ligand docking.
    Morreale A; Gil-Redondo R; Ortiz AR
    Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):606-16. PubMed ID: 17330937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain.
    Hou T; Zhang W; Case DA; Wang W
    J Mol Biol; 2008 Feb; 376(4):1201-14. PubMed ID: 18206907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Calculation of absolute ligand binding free energy to a ribosome-targeting protein as a function of solvent model.
    Lee MS; Olson MA
    J Phys Chem B; 2008 Oct; 112(42):13411-7. PubMed ID: 18821791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Novel statistical-thermodynamic methods to predict protein-ligand binding positions using probability distribution functions.
    Ruvinsky AM; Kozintsev AV
    Proteins; 2006 Jan; 62(1):202-8. PubMed ID: 16287127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Lead finder: an approach to improve accuracy of protein-ligand docking, binding energy estimation, and virtual screening.
    Stroganov OV; Novikov FN; Stroylov VS; Kulkov V; Chilov GG
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Dec; 48(12):2371-85. PubMed ID: 19007114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A knowledge-based potential function predicts the specificity and relative binding energy of RNA-binding proteins.
    Zheng S; Robertson TA; Varani G
    FEBS J; 2007 Dec; 274(24):6378-91. PubMed ID: 18005254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Combining docking, molecular dynamics and the linear interaction energy method to predict binding modes and affinities for non-nucleoside inhibitors to HIV-1 reverse transcriptase.
    Carlsson J; Boukharta L; Aqvist J
    J Med Chem; 2008 May; 51(9):2648-56. PubMed ID: 18410085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Novel scoring functions comprising QXP, SASA, and protein side-chain entropy terms.
    Giordanetto F; Cotesta S; Catana C; Trosset JY; Vulpetti A; Stouten PF; Kroemer RT
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(3):882-93. PubMed ID: 15154753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Information theory-based scoring function for the structure-based prediction of protein-ligand binding affinity.
    Kulharia M; Goody RS; Jackson RM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):1990-8. PubMed ID: 18767831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. AIScore chemically diverse empirical scoring function employing quantum chemical binding energies of hydrogen-bonded complexes.
    Raub S; Steffen A; Kämper A; Marian CM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jul; 48(7):1492-510. PubMed ID: 18597446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Energy functions for protein design: adjustment with protein-protein complex affinities, models for the unfolded state, and negative design of solubility and specificity.
    Pokala N; Handel TM
    J Mol Biol; 2005 Mar; 347(1):203-27. PubMed ID: 15733929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. SLICK--scoring and energy functions for protein-carbohydrate interactions.
    Kerzmann A; Neumann D; Kohlbacher O
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(4):1635-42. PubMed ID: 16859295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. PMF scoring revisited.
    Muegge I
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5895-902. PubMed ID: 17004705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Docking enzyme-inhibitor complexes using a preference-based free-energy surface.
    Wallqvist A; Covell DG
    Proteins; 1996 Aug; 25(4):403-19. PubMed ID: 8865336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deducing the energetic cost of protein folding in zinc finger proteins using designed metallopeptides.
    Reddi AR; Guzman TR; Breece RM; Tierney DL; Gibney BR
    J Am Chem Soc; 2007 Oct; 129(42):12815-27. PubMed ID: 17902663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The solvated interaction energy method for scoring binding affinities.
    Sulea T; Purisima EO
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():295-303. PubMed ID: 22183544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Continued development of an empirical function for predicting and rationalizing protein-protein binding affinities.
    Audie J
    Biophys Chem; 2009 Aug; 143(3):139-44. PubMed ID: 19487068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.