1111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17600659)
1. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The value of 3D-CT angiographic assessment prior to carotid stenting.
Wyers MC; Powell RJ; Fillinger MF; Nolan BW; Cronenwett JL
J Vasc Surg; 2009 Mar; 49(3):614-22. PubMed ID: 19268765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
Lin J; Li D; Yan F
Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Noninvasive detection of steno-occlusive disease of the supra-aortic arteries with three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: a prospective, intra-individual comparative analysis with digital subtraction angiography.
Willinek WA; von Falkenhausen M; Born M; Gieseke J; Höller T; Klockgether T; Textor HJ; Schild HH; Urbach H
Stroke; 2005 Jan; 36(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 15569881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Sundgren PC; Sundén P; Lindgren A; Lanke J; Holtås S; Larsson EM
Neuroradiology; 2002 Jul; 44(7):592-9. PubMed ID: 12136361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image Quality and Stenosis Assessment of Non-Contrast-Enhanced 3-T Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease Compared with Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography and Digital Subtraction Angiography.
Liu J; Zhang N; Fan Z; Luo N; Zhao Y; Bi X; An J; Chen Z; Liu D; Wen Z; Fan Z; Li D
PLoS One; 2016; 11(11):e0166467. PubMed ID: 27861626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessment of CE-MRA for the rapid detection of supra-aortic vascular disease.
Wright VL; Olan W; Dick B; Yu H; Alberts-Grill N; Latour LL; Baird AE
Neurology; 2005 Jul; 65(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 16009882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy of patient selection strategies for carotid endarterectomy by contrast-enhanced MRA on a 1 T machine and duplex ultrasound in a regional hospital.
Korteweg MA; Kerkhoff H; Bakker J; Elgersma OE
Clin Radiol; 2008 Feb; 63(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 18194694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Overestimation of moderate carotid stenosis assessed by both Doppler US and contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography in the CARMEDAS study.
Nonent M; Ben Salem D; Serfaty JM; Buthion V; Pasco-Papon A; Rotaru C; Bressollette L; Papon X; Pachai C; Fortrat JO; Gouny P; Badra A; Berge J; Le Bras Y; Cottier JP; Gauvrit JY; Douek P
J Neuroradiol; 2011 Jul; 38(3):148-55. PubMed ID: 20728218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptical centric k-space ordering of supra-aortic arteries compared with selective X-ray angiography.
Wutke R; Lang W; Fellner C; Janka R; Denzel C; Lell M; Bautz W; Fellner FA
Stroke; 2002 Jun; 33(6):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12052985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical utility of time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (TRICKS) magnetic resonance angiography for infrageniculate arterial occlusive disease.
Mell M; Tefera G; Thornton F; Siepman D; Turnipseed W
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Mar; 45(3):543-8; discussion 548. PubMed ID: 17223303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis.
D'Onofrio M; Mansueto G; Faccioli N; Guarise A; Tamellini P; Bogina G; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2006 Feb; 111(1):93-103. PubMed ID: 16623309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of colour Doppler ultrasonography, CT angiography and blood-pool-enhanced MR angiography in assessing carotid stenosis: a comparative study with DSA in 170 patients.
Anzidei M; Napoli A; Zaccagna F; Di Paolo P; Saba L; Cavallo Marincola B; Zini C; Cartocci G; Di Mare L; Catalano C; Passariello R
Radiol Med; 2012 Feb; 117(1):54-71. PubMed ID: 21424318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What are current preprocedure imaging requirements for carotid artery stenting and carotid endarterectomy: have magnetic resonance angiography and computed tomographic angiography made a difference?
Maldonado TS
Semin Vasc Surg; 2007 Dec; 20(4):205-15. PubMed ID: 18082837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.
Doelman C; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Froger CL; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Cuypers PW; Douwes-Draaijer P; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
J Vasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 42(4):739-46. PubMed ID: 16242563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR angiography: Diagnostic performance of four doses for detection and grading of carotid, renal, and aorto-iliac stenoses compared to digital subtraction angiography.
Schneider G; Ballarati C; Grazioli L; Manfredi R; Thurnher S; Kroencke TJ; Taupitz M; Merlino B; Bonomo L; Shen N; Pirovano G; Kirchin MA; Spinazzi A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Oct; 26(4):1020-32. PubMed ID: 17896354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of atherosclerotic internal carotid stenosis as the noninvasive imaging modality in revascularization decision making.
Cosottini M; Pingitore A; Puglioli M; Michelassi MC; Lupi G; Abbruzzese A; Calabrese R; Lombardi M; Parenti G; Bartolozzi C
Stroke; 2003 Mar; 34(3):660-4. PubMed ID: 12624288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Duplex ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography in carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review.
Nederkoorn PJ; van der Graaf Y; Hunink MG
Stroke; 2003 May; 34(5):1324-32. PubMed ID: 12690221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Overestimation of carotid artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
Nederkoorn PJ; Elgersma OE; Mali WP; Eikelboom BC; Kappelle LJ; van der Graaf Y
J Vasc Surg; 2002 Oct; 36(4):806-13. PubMed ID: 12368742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance angiography is an accurate imaging adjunct to duplex ultrasound scan in patient selection for carotid endarterectomy.
Back MR; Wilson JS; Rushing G; Stordahl N; Linden C; Johnson BL; Bandyk DF
J Vasc Surg; 2000 Sep; 32(3):429-38; discussion 439-40. PubMed ID: 10957649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
