BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17600934)

  • 1. Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.
    Primic-Zakelj M; Repse-Fokter A
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():23-6. PubMed ID: 17600934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cervical cancer screening. Organised screening to avoid unnecessary conisation.
    Prescrire Int; 2010 Aug; 19(108):172-7, 179. PubMed ID: 20939454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of an antepartum Pap smear on the coverage of a cervical cancer screening programme: a population-based prospective study.
    Nygård M; Daltveit AK; Thoresen SO; Nygård JF
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2007 Jan; 7():10. PubMed ID: 17244348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monitoring the performance of New Zealand's National Cervical Screening Programme through data linkage.
    Lewis H; Yeh LC; Almendral B; Neal H
    N Z Med J; 2009 Oct; 122(1305):15-25. PubMed ID: 19966874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.
    Kesić V; Jovićević-Bekić A; Vujnović M
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():31-6. PubMed ID: 17598502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. A one-year registration of cervical cytological tests].
    Bjørge T; Gunbjørud AB; Langmark F; Skare GB; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1994 Jan; 114(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 8191435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
    Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
    Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Screening-preventable cervical cancer risks: evidence from a nationwide audit in Sweden.
    Andrae B; Kemetli L; Sparén P; Silfverdal L; Strander B; Ryd W; Dillner J; Törnberg S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(9):622-9. PubMed ID: 18445828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries.
    Sankaranarayanan R; Budukh AM; Rajkumar R
    Bull World Health Organ; 2001; 79(10):954-62. PubMed ID: 11693978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cancer screening in Singapore, with particular reference to breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening.
    Yeoh KG; Chew L; Wang SC
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S14-9. PubMed ID: 17227636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in Croatia.
    Grce M; Grahovac B; Rukavina T; Vrdoljak-Mozetic D; Glavas-Obrovac L; Kaliterna V; Zele-Starcević L
    Coll Antropol; 2007 Apr; 31 Suppl 2():67-71. PubMed ID: 17598507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Cervical cancer screening for high risk women: is it possible? Results of a cervical cancer screening program in three suburban districts of Lyon].
    Mignotte H; Perol D; Fontanière B; Nachury LP; Blanc-Jouvand A; Fouillat V; Chauvin F; Lasset C
    Bull Cancer; 1999 Jun; 86(6):573-9. PubMed ID: 10417430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Proposal of cervical cancer early detection programme in Croatia].
    Znaor A; Babić D; Corusić A; Grce M; Mahovlić V; Pajtler M; Serman A
    Lijec Vjesn; 2007 May; 129(5):158-63. PubMed ID: 17695198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Screening for cervical cancer in the county of Funen. Status of 25 years of development and experiences].
    Hølund B; Grinsted P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2006 May; 168(22):2163-6. PubMed ID: 16768956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathways to diagnosis of cervical cancer: screening history, delay in follow up, and smear reading.
    Priest P; Sadler L; Peters J; Crengle S; Bethwaite P; Medley G; Jackson R
    BJOG; 2007 Apr; 114(4):398-407. PubMed ID: 17166215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why do women still develop cancer of the cervix despite the existence of a national screening programme?
    Brinkmann D; Gladman MA; Norman S; Lawton FG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Mar; 119(1):123-4. PubMed ID: 15734097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical cancer screening programme in Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia--the results of the pilot study.
    Vrdoljak-Mozetic D; Ostojić DV; Stemberger-Papić S; Janković S; Glibotić-Kresina H; Brncić-Fischer A; Benić-Salamon K
    Coll Antropol; 2010 Mar; 34(1):225-32. PubMed ID: 20437641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The 1996 revision of the Dutch cervical cancer screening programme: increased coverage, fewer repeat smears and less opportunistic screening].
    Berkers LM; van Ballegooijen M; van Kemenade FJ; Rebolj M; Essink-Bot ML; Helmerhorst TJ; Habbema JD
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2007 Jun; 151(23):1288-94. PubMed ID: 17624160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
    Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
    J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effective cervical cytology screening programmes in middle-income countries: the Chilean experience.
    Sepúlveda C; Prado R
    Cancer Detect Prev; 2005; 29(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 16188399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.