These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17601278)

  • 61. PC
    Amirav I; Newhouse MT
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2019 Apr; 199(8):1037-1038. PubMed ID: 30640509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Reply to Amirav and Newhouse: PC
    Kaminsky D; Coates A; Culver B; Cockcroft D; Hallstrand T; Haynes J; MacIntyre N; Wanger J
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2019 Apr; 199(8):1038. PubMed ID: 30640508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effects of provocholine and methacholine on airway responses.
    Ferrari M; Olivieri M; Faccini G; Poli A; Balestreri F; Lo Cascio V
    Allergy; 2000 Dec; 55(12):1204-5. PubMed ID: 11117286
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Realising the potential of various inhaled airway challenge agents through improved delivery to the lungs.
    Lexmond AJ; Singh D; Frijlink HW; Clarke GW; Page CP; Forbes B; van den Berge M
    Pulm Pharmacol Ther; 2018 Apr; 49():27-35. PubMed ID: 29331645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Differences between bronchial response in children and adults with asthma to ultrasonically nebulized distilled water and methacholine.
    de Benedictis FM; Todisco T; Dottorini M
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 1989; 7(2):126. PubMed ID: 2677943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Nebulized sodium cromoglycate in preterm infants--protection against water challenge-induced bronchoconstriction.
    Yuksel B; Greenough A
    Respir Med; 1993 Jan; 87(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8438098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [VEMS and specific conductance (SGaw) to assess the nonspecific methacholine challenge test].
    de Vega Gómez A; Payo Losa F; Palenciano Ballesteros L
    Arch Bronconeumol; 1999 Apr; 35(4):195-6. PubMed ID: 10330546
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Sample size calculations and methacholine challenge tests.
    Inman MD; Norman G
    Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2006 Sep; 44(9):449-50; author reply 451-2, discussion 452. PubMed ID: 16995334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Abbreviated methacholine challenge: how safe are short procedures?
    Bar-Yishay E
    Chest; 2002 Aug; 122(2):752-3; author reply 753. PubMed ID: 12171865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Dosimeter: what is the dose?
    Hargreave F
    Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol; 2005 Jan; 94(1):14. PubMed ID: 15702809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Cold dry air challenge for measuring bronchial responsiveness--where do we stand?
    Zach M
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 1995 Jun; 19(6):323-5. PubMed ID: 7567209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Methodology of bronchial responsiveness.
    Chinn S
    Thorax; 1998 Nov; 53(11):984-8. PubMed ID: 10193400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Urban levels of air pollution increase lung responsiveness in rats.
    Pereira P; Saldiva PH; Sakae RS; Bohm GM; Martins MA
    Environ Res; 1995 May; 69(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 8608776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Inhalation therapy: provocation tests, infectious risks, acute bronchiolitis and ENT diseases. GAT aerosolstorming, Paris 2011].
    Dres M; Ferre A; Becquemin MH; Dessanges JF; Reychler G; Durand M; Escabasse V; Sauvaget E; Dubus JC
    Rev Mal Respir; 2012 Dec; 29(10):1186-97. PubMed ID: 23228677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Mechanism of methacholine dose-response plateus in normal subjects.
    Brown RH; Mitzner W
    Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 1999 May; 159(5 Pt 1):1684. PubMed ID: 10375256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Methods of testing nonspecific bronchial hyperresponsiveness.
    Eiser N
    Eur Respir J; 1988 May; 1(5):482-3. PubMed ID: 3049141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Respiratory mechanics evaluation of mice submitted to intravenous methacholine: Bolus vs. continuous infusion.
    Vitorasso RL; de Oliveira MA; Tavares-de-Lima W; Moriya HT
    Exp Biol Med (Maywood); 2020 Apr; 245(8):680-689. PubMed ID: 32183551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. A critical evaluation of the Mefar dosimeter.
    Ward RJ; Liakakos P; Leonard RF; Reid DW; Johns DP; Walters EH
    Eur Respir J; 1999 Aug; 14(2):430-4. PubMed ID: 10515425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Bronchoprovocation committee report. American Academy of Allergy and Immunology.
    Shapiro GG; Simon RA
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 1992 Mar; 89(3):775-8. PubMed ID: 1545099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Coronary and laryngeal spasm provoked by methacholine inhalation.
    Parameswaran K; Cox G; Kitching A; Hargreave F
    J Allergy Clin Immunol; 2001 Feb; 107(2):392-3. PubMed ID: 11174212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.