BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17601537)

  • 1. CT dose optimization when changing to CT multi-detector row technology.
    Verdun FR; Gutierrez D; Schnyder P; Aroua A; Bochud F; Gudinchet F
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2007; 36(4):176-84. PubMed ID: 17601537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Single-slice and multi-slice computerized tomography: dosimetric comparison with diagnostic reference dose levels].
    Moro L; Bolsi A; Baldi M; Bertoli G; Fantinato D
    Radiol Med; 2001 Oct; 102(4):262-5. PubMed ID: 11740455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed tomography radiation dose optimization: scanning protocols and clinical applications of automatic exposure control.
    Kalra MK; Naz N; Rizzo SM; Blake MA
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2005; 34(5):171-81. PubMed ID: 16129235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner.
    McCollough CH; Primak AN; Saba O; Bruder H; Stierstorfer K; Raupach R; Suess C; Schmidt B; Ohnesorge BM; Flohr TG
    Radiology; 2007 Jun; 243(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 17446525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The relevance of image quality indices for dose optimization in abdominal multi-detector row CT in children: experimental assessment with pediatric phantoms.
    Brisse HJ; Brenot J; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; Savignoni A; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 54(7):1871-92. PubMed ID: 19265204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recent technologic advances in multi-detector row cardiac CT.
    Halliburton SS
    Cardiol Clin; 2009 Nov; 27(4):655-64. PubMed ID: 19766922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
    Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
    Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PET/CT and SPECT/CT dosimetry in children: the challenge to the pediatric imager.
    Gelfand MJ; Lemen LC
    Semin Nucl Med; 2007 Sep; 37(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 17707244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Importance in optimization of multi-slice computed tomography scan protocols.
    Heggie JC; Kay JK; Lee WK
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 16732832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of scan length on the exposure levels in 16- and 64-row multidetector computed tomography: a phantom study.
    Irwan R; de Vries HB; Sijens PE
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1142-7. PubMed ID: 18692755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of dose metrics and radiation risk models when optimizing CT x-ray tube voltage.
    Huda W; Ogden KM; Khorasani MR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4719-32. PubMed ID: 18695298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
    Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
    Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between noise, dose, and pitch in cardiac multi-detector row CT.
    Primak AN; McCollough CH; Bruesewitz MR; Zhang J; Fletcher JG
    Radiographics; 2006; 26(6):1785-94. PubMed ID: 17102050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. CT dose: how to measure, how to reduce.
    McCollough CH
    Health Phys; 2008 Nov; 95(5):508-17. PubMed ID: 18849683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation. Multislice computed tomography systems.
    Health Devices; 2002 May; 31(5):161-88. PubMed ID: 12449920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose reduction and image quality assessment in 64-detector row computed tomography of the coronary arteries using an automatic exposure control system.
    Francone M; Di Castro E; Napoli A; Bolzan C; Carbone I; Bertoletti L; Iuliano L; Catalano C; Passariello R
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2008; 32(5):668-78. PubMed ID: 18830094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT.
    Kalender WA; Buchenau S; Deak P; Kellermeier M; Langner O; van Straten M; Vollmar S; Wilharm S
    Phys Med; 2008 Jun; 24(2):71-9. PubMed ID: 18331808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quality.
    Goldman LW
    J Nucl Med Technol; 2007 Dec; 35(4):213-25; quiz 226-8. PubMed ID: 18006597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current modulation for CT.
    Kalra MK; Maher MM; Toth TL; Schmidt B; Westerman BL; Morgan HT; Saini S
    Radiology; 2004 Dec; 233(3):649-57. PubMed ID: 15498896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the weighted CT dose index in modern multi-detector CT scanners.
    Perisinakis K; Damilakis J; Tzedakis A; Papadakis A; Theocharopoulos N; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Nov; 52(21):6485-95. PubMed ID: 17951857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.