115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17601868)
21. Equity and health services.
Bayoumi AM
J Public Health Policy; 2009 Jul; 30(2):176-82. PubMed ID: 19597449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cost-effectiveness analysis and formulary decision making in England: findings from research.
Williams IP; Bryan S
Soc Sci Med; 2007 Nov; 65(10):2116-29. PubMed ID: 17698271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Integrating health law and health policy: a European perspective.
Legemaate J
Health Policy; 2002 May; 60(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 11897371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New law, new nurses.
Davidson J
Br J Perioper Nurs; 2000 Oct; 10(10):502-3. PubMed ID: 11892312
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Resource allocation and the duty to give reasons.
Stanton-Ife J
Health Care Anal; 2006 Sep; 14(3):145-56. PubMed ID: 17214250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The impact of European Union law on Human Rights.
Hodgson J
Br J Nurs; 2009 Apr 9-22; 18(7):434-6. PubMed ID: 19373189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Being 'rational' and being 'human': How National Health Service rationing decisions are constructed as rational by resource allocation panels.
Russell J; Greenhalgh T
Health (London); 2014 Sep; 18(5):441-57. PubMed ID: 24287296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Right to receive treatment in accordance with the Human Rights Act 1998.
Wicks E
Br J Nurs; 2009 Oct 22-Nov 11; 18(19):1192-3. PubMed ID: 19966746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Healthcare scandals in the NHS: crime and punishment.
Alghrani A; Brazier M; Farrell AM; Griffiths D; Allen N
J Med Ethics; 2011 Apr; 37(4):230-2. PubMed ID: 21303793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Enforcing a duty to care for patients in the NHS.
Brahams D
Lancet; 1984 Nov; 2(8413):1224-5. PubMed ID: 6150273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Resource allocation decisions in Canada's health care system: can these decisions be challenged in a court of law.
Sweatman LR; Woollard D
Health Policy; 2002 Dec; 62(3):275-90. PubMed ID: 12385851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [On the Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. The S.H. and others against Austria. TEDH 2010/56 of April 1, on human assisted reproduction and its incidence on the European legislative arena].
Vidal MartÃnez J
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2011; (34):155-201. PubMed ID: 22977960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Rationing healthcare in New Zealand: the use of clinical guidelines.
Feek CM
Med J Aust; 2000 Oct; 173(8):423-6. PubMed ID: 11090036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Juridification, medicalisation, and the impact of EU Law: patient mobility and the allocation of scarce NHS resources.
Veitch K
Med Law Rev; 2012; 20(3):362-98. PubMed ID: 22535326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The impact of the European Convention on Human Rights on Medical Law.
Havers P
Med Leg J; 2002; 70(Pt 2):57-70. PubMed ID: 12024878
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Rurality and resource allocation in the UK.
Watt IS; Sheldon TA
Health Policy; 1993 Nov; 26(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 10130843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2012/13 Case of Panaitescu v. Romania, 10 April 2012, no. 30909/06.
Hendriks A; Toebes B
Eur J Health Law; 2012 Dec; 19(5):515-7. PubMed ID: 23198489
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The legal system. Part 2: it's not just for lawyers.
Boylan-Kemp J
Br J Nurs; 2009 Feb 12-25; 18(3):178-80. PubMed ID: 19223804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The Compatibility of Mandatory Vaccination with the European Convention on Human Rights: Implications for a National Vaccination Policy.
Simons RC; Ploem MC; Legemaate J
Eur J Health Law; 2024 Apr; 31(3):285-311. PubMed ID: 38704150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Nicholson acts to ensure that trusts and CCGs do not blacklist drugs approved by NICE.
Torjesen I
BMJ; 2012 Aug; 345():e5465. PubMed ID: 22890032
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
