294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17601870)
1. Participation in biomedical research is an imperfect moral duty: a response to John Harris.
Shapshay S; Pimple KD
J Med Ethics; 2007 Jul; 33(7):414-7. PubMed ID: 17601870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Free riders and pious sons--why science research remains obligatory.
Chan S; Harris J
Bioethics; 2009 Mar; 23(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 18445091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. John Harris' argument for a duty to research.
Brassington I
Bioethics; 2007 Mar; 21(3):160-8. PubMed ID: 17845487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Defending the duty to research?
Brassington I
Bioethics; 2011 Jan; 25(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 19594723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?
de Melo-Martin I
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):28-36. PubMed ID: 19003704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The re-emergence of the liberal-communitarian debate in bioethics: exercising self-determination and participation in biomedical research.
Christensen E
J Med Philos; 2012 Jun; 37(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 22556260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Why participating in (certain) scientific research is a moral duty.
Stjernschantz Forsberg J; Hansson MG; Eriksson S
J Med Ethics; 2014 May; 40(5):325-8. PubMed ID: 23371315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. In defense of the duty to participate in biomedical research.
Rhodes R
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):37-8. PubMed ID: 19003705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The obligation to participate in biomedical research.
Schaefer GO; Emanuel EJ; Wertheimer A
JAMA; 2009 Jul; 302(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 19567441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Research participation: are we subject to a duty?
Wachbroit R; Wasserman D
Am J Bioeth; 2005; 5(1):48-9; author reply W15-8. PubMed ID: 16036661
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In defence of moral imperialism: four equal and universal prima facie principles.
Dawson A; Garrard E
J Med Ethics; 2006 Apr; 32(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 16574872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The place of autonomy in bioethics.
Childress JF
Hastings Cent Rep; 1990; 20(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 2179164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When intuition is not enough. Why the Principle of Procreative Beneficence must work much harder to justify its eugenic vision.
Bennett R
Bioethics; 2014 Nov; 28(9):447-55. PubMed ID: 23841936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nursing research: is there an obligation on subjects to participate?
Sim J
J Adv Nurs; 1991 Nov; 16(11):1284-9. PubMed ID: 1753023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Beneficence, justice, and health care.
Kelleher JP
Kennedy Inst Ethics J; 2014 Mar; 24(1):27-49. PubMed ID: 24783323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Collectivizing rescue obligations in bioethics.
Garrett JR
Am J Bioeth; 2015; 15(2):3-11. PubMed ID: 25674948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Response to open peer commentaries on "A duty to participate in research: does social context matter?".
de Melo-Martin I
Am J Bioeth; 2008 Oct; 8(10):W3-4. PubMed ID: 19003693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The fallacy of the Principle of Procreative Beneficence.
Bennett R
Bioethics; 2009 Jun; 23(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 18477055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The moral primacy of the human being.
Parker C
J Med Ethics; 2010 Sep; 36(9):563-6. PubMed ID: 20693483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Is Acute Care-Oriented Research Ethical in Resource-Limited Settings?
Jackson AD; Neighbors HW
AMA J Ethics; 2017 Oct; 19(10):978-988. PubMed ID: 29028466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
