These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. NIH funding: what does the future look like? Avantaggiati ML Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17436448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. NIH funding: what does the future look like? Furcht LT Science; 2007 Apr; 316(5822):198-200; author reply 198-200. PubMed ID: 17431152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. U.S. budget. Agencies sweat the details of spending billions more on science. Mervis J Science; 2009 Feb; 323(5915):696-7. PubMed ID: 19197027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. 2008 U.S. budget. Research rises--and falls--in the president's spending plan. Mervis J Science; 2007 Feb; 315(5813):750-3. PubMed ID: 17289949 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Re-aim blame for NIH's hard times. Bishop JM; Varmus H Science; 2006 Apr; 312(5773):499. PubMed ID: 16645053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. National Cancer Act: a look back and forward. Vanchieri C J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Mar; 99(5):342-5. PubMed ID: 17341721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Basic biomedical research and the public's health cost...time...focus. Fitzgerald RS Physiologist; 2007 Feb; 50(1):1, 3-4. PubMed ID: 17366939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomedical research. The graying of NIH research. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Nov; 322(5903):848-9. PubMed ID: 18988821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. U.S. science policy. NIH stimulus plan triggers flood of applications--and anxiety. Kaiser J Science; 2009 Apr; 324(5925):318-9. PubMed ID: 19372395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. National Institutes of Health. Changes in peer review target young scientists, heavyweights. Kaiser J Science; 2008 Jun; 320(5882):1404. PubMed ID: 18556519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The stimulus package and medical therapeutics. Somberg JC Am J Ther; 2009; 16(2):105. PubMed ID: 19262356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances. Mervis J Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):714-5. PubMed ID: 18258869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Biomedical politics. Sex studies denounced, NIH's peer-review process defended. Kaiser J Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5647):966-7. PubMed ID: 14605337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Addressing the decline in NIH pain research funding. Max MB J Pain; 2008 Dec; 9(12):1074-6. PubMed ID: 19038769 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Changes in the research landscape require a new approach, while continuing to fund the highest scientific priorities. Jennifer Taylor talks with Dr Elizabeth Nabel, Director of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Library. Nabel E Eur Heart J; 2009 Jun; 30(12):1423-5. PubMed ID: 19533911 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]