These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17602255)

  • 1. Determinants of spatial and temporal patterns in compensatory wetland mitigation.
    BenDor T; Brozović N
    Environ Manage; 2007 Sep; 40(3):349-64. PubMed ID: 17602255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landscape characteristics of a stream and wetland mitigation banking program.
    BenDor T; Sholtes J; Doyle MW
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):2078-92. PubMed ID: 20014580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a market in wetland credits: entrepreneurial wetland banking in Chicago.
    Robertson M; Hayden N
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):636-46. PubMed ID: 18577091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Land use planning and social equity in North Carolina's compensatory wetland and stream mitigation programs.
    BenDor T; Stewart A
    Environ Manage; 2011 Feb; 47(2):239-53. PubMed ID: 21136054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An Assessment of Long-Term Compliance with Performance Standards in Compensatory Mitigation Wetlands.
    Van den Bosch K; Matthews JW
    Environ Manage; 2017 Apr; 59(4):546-556. PubMed ID: 27981354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new approach for hydrologic performance standards in wetland mitigation.
    Sueltenfuss JP; Cooper DJ
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Feb; 231():1154-1163. PubMed ID: 30602240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wetland mitigation compliance in the western upper peninsula of Michigan.
    Hornyak MM; Halvorsen KE
    Environ Manage; 2003 Nov; 32(5):535-40. PubMed ID: 15015692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance criteria, compliance success, and vegetation development in compensatory mitigation wetlands.
    Matthews JW; Endress AG
    Environ Manage; 2008 Jan; 41(1):130-41. PubMed ID: 17676406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling the suitability of potential wetland mitigation sites with a geographic information system.
    Van Lonkhuyzen RA; LaGory KE; Kuiper JA
    Environ Manage; 2004 Mar; 33(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 15031767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Wetland ecological and compliance assessments in the San Francisco Bay Region, California, USA.
    Breaux A; Cochrane S; Evens J; Martindale M; Pavlik B; Suer L; Benner D
    J Environ Manage; 2005 Feb; 74(3):217-37. PubMed ID: 15644262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale.
    Wang X; Shang S; Qu Z; Liu T; Melesse AM; Yang W
    J Environ Manage; 2010 Jul; 91(7):1511-25. PubMed ID: 20236754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compensatory stream and wetland mitigation in North Carolina: an evaluation of regulatory success.
    Hill T; Kulz E; Munoz B; Dorney JR
    Environ Manage; 2013 May; 51(5):1077-91. PubMed ID: 23515905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Review and Comparison of Wetland Impacts and Mitigation Requirements Between New Jersey, USA, Freshwater Wetlands Protection Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act.
    Torok LS; Lockwood S; Fanz D
    Environ Manage; 1996 Sep; 20(5):741-52. PubMed ID: 8703111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Compliance with wetland mitigation standards in the upper peninsula of Michigan, USA.
    Kozich AT; Halvorsen KE
    Environ Manage; 2012 Jul; 50(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 22543680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inventorying and monitoring wetland condition and restoration potential on a watershed basis with examples from spring creek watershed, Pennsylvania, USA.
    Brooks RP; Wardrop DH; Cole CA
    Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 38(4):673-87. PubMed ID: 16841177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Successional dynamics of a 35 year old freshwater mitigation wetland in southeastern New Hampshire.
    McKown JG; Moore GE; Payne AR; White NA; Gibson JL
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251748. PubMed ID: 33999932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Community structure and quality after 10 years in two central Ohio mitigation bank wetlands.
    Spieles DJ; Coneybeer M; Horn J
    Environ Manage; 2006 Nov; 38(5):837-52. PubMed ID: 16841175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trajectories of vegetation-based indicators used to assess wetland restoration progress.
    Matthews JW; Spyreas G; Endress AG
    Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):2093-107. PubMed ID: 20014581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The land value impacts of wetland restoration.
    Kaza N; BenDor TK
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Sep; 127():289-99. PubMed ID: 23792789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling hydrological effects of wetland restoration: a differentiated view.
    Staes J; Rubarenzya MH; Meire P; Willems P
    Water Sci Technol; 2009; 59(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 19213997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.