These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17602548)
1. Evaluations of molecular docking programs for virtual screening. Onodera K; Satou K; Hirota H J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(4):1609-18. PubMed ID: 17602548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. pso@autodock: a fast flexible molecular docking program based on Swarm intelligence. Namasivayam V; Günther R Chem Biol Drug Des; 2007 Dec; 70(6):475-84. PubMed ID: 17986206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of several molecular docking programs: pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy. Cross JB; Thompson DC; Rai BK; Baber JC; Fan KY; Hu Y; Humblet C J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Jun; 49(6):1455-74. PubMed ID: 19476350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Critical assessment of the automated AutoDock as a new docking tool for virtual screening. Park H; Lee J; Lee S Proteins; 2006 Nov; 65(3):549-54. PubMed ID: 16988956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. High quality binding modes in docking ligands to proteins. Gorelik B; Goldblum A Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1373-86. PubMed ID: 18058908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis and optimization of structure-based virtual screening protocols (1): exploration of ligand conformational sampling techniques. Good AC; Cheney DL J Mol Graph Model; 2003 Sep; 22(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 12798388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems. Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Catalytic site prediction and virtual screening of cytochrome P450 2D6 substrates by consideration of water and rescoring in automated docking. de Graaf C; Oostenbrink C; Keizers PH; van der Wijst T; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP J Med Chem; 2006 Apr; 49(8):2417-30. PubMed ID: 16610785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Docking and scoring with alternative side-chain conformations. Hartmann C; Antes I; Lengauer T Proteins; 2009 Feb; 74(3):712-26. PubMed ID: 18704939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of shape-matching and docking as virtual screening tools. Hawkins PC; Skillman AG; Nicholls A J Med Chem; 2007 Jan; 50(1):74-82. PubMed ID: 17201411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multiple active site corrections for docking and virtual screening. Vigers GP; Rizzi JP J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):80-9. PubMed ID: 14695822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrating structure- and ligand-based virtual screening: comparison of individual, parallel, and fused molecular docking and similarity search calculations on multiple targets. Tan L; Geppert H; Sisay MT; Gütschow M; Bajorath J ChemMedChem; 2008 Oct; 3(10):1566-71. PubMed ID: 18651695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Importance of molecular computer modeling in anticancer drug development. Geromichalos GD J BUON; 2007 Sep; 12 Suppl 1():S101-18. PubMed ID: 17935268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Detailed comparison of the protein-ligand docking efficiencies of GOLD, a commercial package and ArgusLab, a licensable freeware. Joy S; Nair PS; Hariharan R; Pillai MR In Silico Biol; 2006; 6(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 17518767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]