These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17602886)

  • 1. Subsidence and malplacement with the Oblique Maverick Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty: technical note.
    Marshman LA; Friesem T; Rampersaud YR; Le Huec JC; Krishna M
    Spine J; 2008; 8(4):650-5. PubMed ID: 17602886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Significantly improved lumbar arthroplasty placement using image guidance: technical note.
    Marshman LA; Friesem T; Rampersaud YR; Le Huec JC; Krishna M; Reddy GR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(18):2027-30. PubMed ID: 17700452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The accuracy and validity of "routine" X-rays in estimating lumbar disc arthroplasty placement.
    Marshman LA; Trewhella M; Friesem T; Rampersaud YR; Le Huec JC; Krishna M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):E661-6. PubMed ID: 17978641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of lumbar total disc replacement with the CHARITE artificial disc versus lumbar fusion: five-year follow-up.
    Guyer RD; McAfee PC; Banco RJ; Bitan FD; Cappuccino A; Geisler FH; Hochschuler SH; Holt RT; Jenis LG; Majd ME; Regan JJ; Tromanhauser SG; Wong DC; Blumenthal SL
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 18805066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Total disc arthroplasty: consequences for sagittal balance and lumbar spine movement.
    Tournier C; Aunoble S; Le Huec JC; Lemaire JP; Tropiano P; Lafage V; Skalli W
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Mar; 16(3):411-21. PubMed ID: 16960704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical kinematics after fusion and bryan disc arthroplasty.
    Sasso RC; Best NM
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 18418131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Insertion of the artificial disc replacement: a cadaver study comparing the conventional surgical technique and the use of a navigation system.
    Rauschmann MA; Thalgott J; Fogarty M; Nichlos M; Kleinszig G; Knap M; Kafchitsas K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(10):1110-5. PubMed ID: 19404182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed tomography assessment of the accuracy of in vivo placement of artificial discs in the lumbar spine including radiographic and clinical consequences.
    Patel VV; Andrews C; Pradhan BB; Bae HW; Kanim LE; Kropf MA; Delamarter RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Apr; 31(8):948-53. PubMed ID: 16622387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lumbar total disc arthroplasty in patients older than 60 years of age: a prospective study of the ProDisc prosthesis with 2-year minimum follow-up period.
    Bertagnoli R; Yue JJ; Nanieva R; Fenk-Mayer A; Husted DS; Shah RV; Emerson JW
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2006 Feb; 4(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 16506473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Total disc prosthesis for painful degenerative lumbar disc disease].
    Karatoprak O; Aydoğan M; Oztürk C; Mirzanli C; Tezer M; Hamzaoğlu A
    Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc; 2007; 41(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 18180557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioactive titanium calcium phosphate coating for disc arthroplasty: analysis of 58 vertebral end plates after 6- to 12-month implantation.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):836-45. PubMed ID: 19482520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical results of Maverick lumbar total disc replacement: two-year prospective follow-up.
    Le Huec JC; Mathews H; Basso Y; Aunoble S; Hoste D; Bley B; Friesem T
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 15950691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level Maverick disc replacement with a hybrid one-level disc replacement and one-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Erkan S; Rivera Y; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
    Spine J; 2009 Oct; 9(10):830-5. PubMed ID: 19477692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Results of the prospective, randomized, multicenter Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption study of the ProDisc-L total disc replacement versus circumferential fusion for the treatment of 1-level degenerative disc disease.
    Zigler J; Delamarter R; Spivak JM; Linovitz RJ; Danielson GO; Haider TT; Cammisa F; Zuchermann J; Balderston R; Kitchel S; Foley K; Watkins R; Bradford D; Yue J; Yuan H; Herkowitz H; Geiger D; Bendo J; Peppers T; Sachs B; Girardi F; Kropf M; Goldstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1155-62; discussion 1163. PubMed ID: 17495770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiologic landmark accuracy for optimum coronal placement of total disc arthroplasty in the lumbar spine.
    Mistry DN; Robertson PA
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):231-6. PubMed ID: 16778655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complications and strategies for revision surgery in total disc replacement.
    Bertagnoli R; Zigler J; Karg A; Voigt S
    Orthop Clin North Am; 2005 Jul; 36(3):389-95. PubMed ID: 15950699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lumbar disc arthroplasty with Maverick disc versus stand-alone interbody fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled, multicenter investigational device exemption trial.
    Gornet MF; Burkus JK; Dryer RF; Peloza JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25):E1600-11. PubMed ID: 21415812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of two retroperitoneal surgical approaches for total disc arthroplasty of the lumbar spine.
    Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Spivak JM; Goldstein J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):205-9. PubMed ID: 18197108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Arthroplasty in the military: a preliminary experience with ProDisc-C and ProDisc-L.
    Tumialán LM; Ponton RP; Garvin A; Gluf WM
    Neurosurg Focus; 2010 May; 28(5):E18. PubMed ID: 20568934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative charge analysis of one- and two-level lumbar total disc arthroplasty versus circumferential lumbar fusion.
    Levin DA; Bendo JA; Quirno M; Errico T; Goldstein J; Spivak J
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Dec; 32(25):2905-9. PubMed ID: 18246016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.